From: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
To: "Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
Santhapur Naveen <naveens@amiindia.co.in>,
"Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Sivaraman Nainar <sivaramann@amiindia.co.in>,
"Madhan B. Santharam" <madhans@ami.com>
Subject: Re: Classless IP support for IPv4 PXE boot
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:27:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B7274137C86B2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B1FF2E9001CE9041BD10B825821D5BC55495D5A4@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Yeah, thanks for digging this out. Classless IP was not considered here.
Jiaxin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Fu,
> Siyuan
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:21 AM
> To: Santhapur Naveen <naveens@amiindia.co.in>; Ye, Ting
> <ting.ye@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Sivaraman Nainar <sivaramann@amiindia.co.in>; Madhan B. Santharam
> <madhans@ami.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Classless IP support for IPv4 PXE boot
>
> Naveen,
>
> I see it, the corresponding GIT version is
> ce964733292e31dce34e0be651f20a9d79884132.
>
> I believe it's a regression bug, the change assume the IP address is always
> classful. I think it should check the option list to see if a subnet mask option is
> present.
>
> Could you please file a new bug in the Tianocore Bugzilla web site. In future
> you can directly report issues to the Bugzilla also. Thanks
> https://tianocore.acgmultimedia.com/
> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Reporting-Issues
>
> Siyuan
>
> From: Santhapur Naveen [mailto:naveens@amiindia.co.in]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:15 AM
> To: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Sivaraman Nainar <sivaramann@amiindia.co.in>; Madhan B. Santharam
> <madhans@ami.com>
> Subject: RE: Classless IP support for IPv4 PXE boot
>
>
> Please find the below details and snapshot.
>
>
>
> Revision: 21543
>
> Author: Wu.Jiaxin
>
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2015 6:13:15 AM
>
> Message: MdeModulePkg: Remove DHCP4.TransmitReceive() and DORA
> process dependency.
>
> Modified:
> /trunk/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Impl.c
>
>
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com<mailto:jiaxin.wu@intel.com>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Ting <ting.ye@intel.com<mailto:ting.ye@intel.com>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com<mailto:siyuan.fu@intel.com>>
>
>
>
> Please check if the below snapshot may help.
>
> [cid:image001.jpg@01D1F92C.D1247640]
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Naveen
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye, Ting [mailto:ting.ye@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:23 AM
> To: Fu, Siyuan; Santhapur Naveen; edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org>
> Cc: Sivaraman Nainar; Madhan B. Santharam
> Subject: RE: Classless IP support for IPv4 PXE boot
>
>
>
> I searched the log messages:
>
>
>
> Revision: 21543
>
> Author: edk2buildsystem
>
> Date: Friday, July 01, 2016 5:05:51 AM
>
> Message:
>
> MdeModulePkg VariableInfo: Fix GCC build failure
>
>
>
> GCC build failure: 'RealCommSize' may be used uninitialized
>
>
>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Giri P Mudusuru
> <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com<mailto:giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>> (cherry
> picked from commit 05b39efb669eaa173a76e58daf8e65bce2e0299e)
>
> ----
>
> Modified :
> /trunk/edk2/MdeModulePkg/Application/VariableInfo/VariableInfo.c
>
>
>
>
>
> This looks irrelevant. Could you please confirm the revision?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ting
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Fu,
> Siyuan
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:48 AM
>
> To: Santhapur Naveen
> <naveens@amiindia.co.in<mailto:naveens@amiindia.co.in>>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
>
> Cc: Sivaraman Nainar
> <sivaramann@amiindia.co.in<mailto:sivaramann@amiindia.co.in>>; Madhan
> B. Santharam <madhans@ami.com<mailto:madhans@ami.com>>
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Classless IP support for IPv4 PXE boot
>
>
>
> Hi, Naveen
>
>
>
> May I know the GIT version of the 21543, or the subject of the commit
> message? I can't see the svn revision number on my side.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Siyuan
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>
> > Santhapur Naveen
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:41 PM
>
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
>
> > Cc: Sivaraman Nainar
> > <sivaramann@amiindia.co.in<mailto:sivaramann@amiindia.co.in>>;
> Madhan
> > B. Santharam
>
> > <madhans@ami.com<mailto:madhans@ami.com>>
>
> > Subject: [edk2] Classless IP support for IPv4 PXE boot
>
> >
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > We happened to observe that the IPv4 PXE boot was happening
>
> > successfully for both classless and classful IPs until the EDKII
>
> > revision 21542. It has been found that there are some changes made in
>
> > the revision
>
> > 21543 and the IPv4 PXE boot is failing for classless IP addresses. The
>
> > failure scenario was debugged and is explained here. Let's assume the
>
> > subnet range is 192.168.1.0/16. The DHCP server tries to allot an IP
>
> > (let's say 192.168.1.0) but based on the first byte of the IP address
>
> > to be assigned, the function NetGetIpClass() returns the IP class as
>
> > Class-C and its respective subnet mask as 255.255.255.0 that should be
>
> > for a classful IP address whereas 255.255.0.0 is the actual subnet in
>
> > this scenario. The changes present in function
>
> > Dhcp4InstanceConfigUdpIo() seems to be responsible for the failure.
>
> >
>
> > May we know the reason behind the changes present in the Dhcp4Impl.c
>
> > of the revision 21543? Is there any plan to bring the classless IP
>
> > support in NetworkPkg?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Naveen
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > edk2-devel mailing list
>
> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
>
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> edk2-devel mailing list
>
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
>
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 11:41 Classless IP support for IPv4 PXE boot Santhapur Naveen
2016-08-18 2:48 ` Fu, Siyuan
2016-08-18 2:53 ` Ye, Ting
2016-08-18 3:15 ` Santhapur Naveen
2016-08-18 3:20 ` Fu, Siyuan
2016-08-18 3:27 ` Wu, Jiaxin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B7274137C86B2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox