From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.16031.1581975806082547194 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:43:26 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: intel.com, ip: 134.134.136.31, mailfrom: jiaxin.wu@intel.com) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2020 13:43:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,454,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="407889685" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2020 13:43:25 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:43:24 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) by fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:43:24 -0800 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:43:24 -0800 Received: from shsmsx107.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.46]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.201]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:43:21 +0800 From: "Wu, Jiaxin" To: Laszlo Ersek , "devel@edk2.groups.io" CC: "Fu, Siyuan" , Maciej Rabeda , "Armour, Nicholas" Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] MdeModulePkg/Ip4Dxe: Check the received package length (CVE-2019-14559). Thread-Topic: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] MdeModulePkg/Ip4Dxe: Check the received package length (CVE-2019-14559). Thread-Index: AQHV5WYQOyNfWycig02XfFfs2xZy6qgerEuAgAE/DaA= Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:43:20 +0000 Message-ID: <895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B72741701C835@SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20200217074349.8924-1-Jiaxin.wu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNWZjMzk0M2UtNTBkNS00MDk5LTk4Y2ItOTYwNjEzMzM2M2MyIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiblg2WjhadEJ0aUkrZTM2VWJYSVpjVGg3TTluUFcrdll5K3dOV0dWT3ZGR2dTaENnRjFiZVJqTjRiOGcyYkQ4YyJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: jiaxin.wu@intel.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Laszlo, Thanks the comments. I have updated the patch to v2. BZ link is https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1610. According= comment 7, the CVE number is CVE-2019-14559 (share with BZ2031). I guess they are produced by the same test environment. So, they are sharin= g the same CVE number. It's the same case for BZ2032. Jian, please correct me if not right. Thanks, Jiaxin >=20 > There are two patches on the list for CVE-2019-14559: >=20 > - [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] MdeModulePkg/Ip4Dxe: Check the received > package length (CVE-2019-14559). > - [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] NetworkPkg/ArpDxe: Recycle invalid ARP > packets(CVE-2019-14559). >=20 > sent by different submitters. >=20 > How do they relate to each other? >=20 > Also, while Nick's patch mentions TianoCore#2031, the current patch doesn= 't > include a BZ link. Is the current patch for TianoCore#2032? (Per > , both BZs shar= e > the same CVE ID.) >=20 > Also, I remain confused (with comment 11 being the latest one, as of this > time, in TianoCore#2032), whether the issue affects IPv4 only, IPv6 only,= or > both. This patch is only for IPv4, apparently. >=20 > If the present patch is related to TianoCore#2032, then please add a mail= ing > list archive link to the BZ, and move the BZ to IN_PROGRESS status. >=20 > Laszlo >=20 > > > > diff --git a/NetworkPkg/Ip4Dxe/Ip4Input.c > b/NetworkPkg/Ip4Dxe/Ip4Input.c > > index fec242c71f..95fbd01d05 100644 > > --- a/NetworkPkg/Ip4Dxe/Ip4Input.c > > +++ b/NetworkPkg/Ip4Dxe/Ip4Input.c > > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ > > /** @file > > IP4 input process. > > > > -Copyright (c) 2005 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > +Copyright (c) 2005 - 2020, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
> > > > SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent > > > > **/ > > @@ -709,14 +709,10 @@ Ip4PreProcessPacket ( > > UINT16 Checksum; > > > > // > > // Check if the IP4 header is correctly formatted. > > // > > - if ((*Packet)->TotalSize < IP4_MIN_HEADLEN) { > > - return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER; > > - } > > - > > HeadLen =3D (Head->HeadLen << 2); > > TotalLen =3D NTOHS (Head->TotalLen); > > > > // > > // Mnp may deliver frame trailer sequence up, trim it off. > > @@ -806,10 +802,34 @@ Ip4PreProcessPacket ( > > } > > > > return EFI_SUCCESS; > > } > > > > +/** > > + This function checks the IPv4 packet length. > > + > > + @param[in] Packet Pointer to the IPv4 Packet to be ch= ecked. > > + > > + @retval TRUE The input IPv4 packet length is valid= . > > + @retval FALSE The input IPv4 packet length is inval= id. > > + > > +**/ > > +BOOLEAN > > +Ip4IsValidPacketLength ( > > + IN NET_BUF *Packet > > + ) > > +{ > > + // > > + // Check the IP4 packet length. > > + // > > + if (Packet->TotalSize < IP4_MIN_HEADLEN) { > > + return FALSE; > > + } > > + > > + return TRUE; > > +} > > + > > /** > > The IP4 input routine. It is called by the IP4_INTERFACE when a > > IP4 fragment is received from MNP. > > > > @param[in] Ip4Instance The IP4 child that request the receiv= e, most > like > > @@ -842,10 +862,14 @@ Ip4AccpetFrame ( > > > > if (EFI_ERROR (IoStatus) || (IpSb->State =3D=3D IP4_SERVICE_DESTROY)= ) { > > goto DROP; > > } > > > > + if (!Ip4IsValidPacketLength (Packet)) { > > + goto RESTART; > > + } > > + > > Head =3D (IP4_HEAD *) NetbufGetByte (Packet, 0, NULL); > > ASSERT (Head !=3D NULL); > > OptionLen =3D (Head->HeadLen << 2) - IP4_MIN_HEADLEN; > > if (OptionLen > 0) { > > Option =3D (UINT8 *) (Head + 1); > > @@ -888,14 +912,18 @@ Ip4AccpetFrame ( > > // > > // If the packet is protected by tunnel mode, parse the inner Ip Pac= ket. > > // > > ZeroMem (&ZeroHead, sizeof (IP4_HEAD)); > > if (0 =3D=3D CompareMem (Head, &ZeroHead, sizeof (IP4_HEAD))) { > > - // Packet may have been changed. Head, HeadLen, TotalLen, and > > - // info must be reloaded before use. The ownership of the packet > > - // is transferred to the packet process logic. > > - // > > + // Packet may have been changed. Head, HeadLen, TotalLen, and > > + // info must be reloaded before use. The ownership of the packet > > + // is transferred to the packet process logic. > > + // > > + if (!Ip4IsValidPacketLength (Packet)) { > > + goto RESTART; > > + } > > + > > Head =3D (IP4_HEAD *) NetbufGetByte (Packet, 0, NULL); > > ASSERT (Head !=3D NULL); > > Status =3D Ip4PreProcessPacket ( > > IpSb, > > &Packet, > >