From: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
To: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe: Fix ASSERT logic in Ip6ProcessRouterAdvertise()
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:21:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B727417061717@SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200402091434.1668-1-maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 5:15 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>;
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe: Fix ASSERT logic in
> Ip6ProcessRouterAdvertise()
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2655
>
> This patch fixes reversed logic of recently added ASSERTs which should
> ensure that Ip6IsNDOptionValid() implementation properly reacts to invalid
> packets.
>
> Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 9c20342eed70ec99ec50cd73cb81804299f05403
> ---
> NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe/Ip6Nd.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe/Ip6Nd.c b/NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe/Ip6Nd.c
> index fd7f60b2f92c..0780a98cb325 100644
> --- a/NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe/Ip6Nd.c
> +++ b/NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe/Ip6Nd.c
> @@ -2111,7 +2111,7 @@ Ip6ProcessRouterAdvertise (
> // Option size validity ensured by Ip6IsNDOptionValid().
>
> //
>
> ASSERT (LinkLayerOption.Length != 0);
>
> - ASSERT (Offset + (UINT32) LinkLayerOption.Length * 8 >= (UINT32) Head-
> >PayloadLength);
>
> + ASSERT (Offset + (UINT32) LinkLayerOption.Length * 8 <= (UINT32)
> Head->PayloadLength);
>
>
>
> ZeroMem (&LinkLayerAddress, sizeof (EFI_MAC_ADDRESS));
>
> CopyMem (&LinkLayerAddress, LinkLayerOption.EtherAddr, 6);
>
> @@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ Ip6ProcessRouterAdvertise (
> // Option size validity ensured by Ip6IsNDOptionValid().
>
> //
>
> ASSERT (PrefixOption.Length == 4);
>
> - ASSERT (Offset + (UINT32) PrefixOption.Length * 8 >= (UINT32) Head-
> >PayloadLength);
>
> + ASSERT (Offset + (UINT32) PrefixOption.Length * 8 <= (UINT32) Head-
> >PayloadLength);
>
>
>
> PrefixOption.ValidLifetime = NTOHL (PrefixOption.ValidLifetime);
>
> PrefixOption.PreferredLifetime = NTOHL
> (PrefixOption.PreferredLifetime);
>
> @@ -2334,7 +2334,7 @@ Ip6ProcessRouterAdvertise (
> // Option size validity ensured by Ip6IsNDOptionValid().
>
> //
>
> ASSERT (MTUOption.Length == 1);
>
> - ASSERT (Offset + (UINT32) MTUOption.Length * 8 >= (UINT32) Head-
> >PayloadLength);
>
> + ASSERT (Offset + (UINT32) MTUOption.Length * 8 <= (UINT32) Head-
> >PayloadLength);
>
>
>
> //
>
> // Use IPv6 minimum link MTU 1280 bytes as the maximum packet size in
> order
>
> --
> 2.24.0.windows.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-03 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-02 9:14 [PATCH v2] NetworkPkg/Ip6Dxe: Fix ASSERT logic in Ip6ProcessRouterAdvertise() Maciej Rabeda
2020-04-03 7:21 ` Wu, Jiaxin [this message]
2020-04-03 12:36 ` [edk2-devel] " Maciej Rabeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B727417061717@SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox