From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg/Misc: Move ARM* BaseMemoryLibStm to MdePkg
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:45:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8A4AB213-88D8-4408-9299-3B2AE4B339F9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160902183215.GG4715@bivouac.eciton.net>
> On 2 sep. 2016, at 19:32, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:11:02PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>> Added the fact that the Stm is not in great shape, I would really
>>>> prefer to get rid of it rather than 'promote' it to the standard ARM
>>>> implementation. Note that we will need another round of updates to the
>>>> platform .DSCs when we remove the Stm version again.
>>>
>>> My main concern is leaving the master branch unusable for ARM during
>>> the Labor Day weekend. If we don't resolve this tonight, with the best
>>> will in the world we won't be back to a functioning master before
>>> Tuesday evening.
>>
>> I agree that fixing the branch now would be nice. I just don't
>> understand why fixing BaseMemoryLibStm in place is not a better
>> solution, especially if we are nuking it anyway next week. That way,
>> we have to change all the platforms only a single time.
>
> Mainly because we don't _know_ that it will be resolved next week and
> I'm currently having some trust issues regarding these libraries.
>
> If that's what it takes to get consensus, sure, I'll go along with
> that. I'm fully aware I'm being slightly irrational here.
>
> So where to now? Just push 2-3 from Wednesday?
>
Yes, please. On Monday, I will look into adding Arm support to the optdxe flavor, and once that is in, we can move all platforms over and deprecate/remove the stm version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-02 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-02 14:29 [PATCH 0/3] MdePkg/Misc: fix Arm BaseMemoryLib Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg/Misc: Move ARM* BaseMemoryLibStm to MdePkg Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 15:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-02 15:23 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 16:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-02 18:05 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 18:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-02 18:32 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 18:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2016-09-02 19:18 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 19:24 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseMemoryLibStm: implement new IsZeroGuid() API function Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] MdePkg/BaseMemoryLibStm: implement new IsZeroBuffer() " Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 14:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] MdePkg/Misc: fix Arm BaseMemoryLib Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-02 14:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-02 16:02 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 15:49 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-02 15:57 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 15:59 ` Andrew Fish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8A4AB213-88D8-4408-9299-3B2AE4B339F9@linaro.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox