From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF6D1A1DFE for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w2so42285881wmd.0 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=C3juWKI1F/g0hz0Sd3ZTNvhTEEafrpNW4RTn6g+rCL8=; b=VjEjyCX30VwyyvhWlLz08V7jJ1ig+v6jd+RzkOHU6xglz4wRxau8S5FEOdvu2+xBAn OwhiO8nWN5PoKlN0QhpsR2bDrkGzN3J7fpq9fVT8viG1ZXy0BwB5x3T/bw6Z+qQdsDYp nucenXjDyfod8HufjhAsT+bQRFY/5kRMzQjZo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=C3juWKI1F/g0hz0Sd3ZTNvhTEEafrpNW4RTn6g+rCL8=; b=m/QRcw37yGPQIRdh2W4plmNJfY6LejScB25e4f2VmjPsUC3PY5e+d36FkSpr0jW/BT K7exT3BlhU6NfjZglmIJLFqX0+/nxownZg0YBRr9IXTdI1v/f2kKjAftNOUyVkghB3KZ ajzryt+s25sPPY/si2GHDv4s9v6LGA2YDtQc31miH6c++aRS3ZSXsDXlb5kgZAarHXYk lsLP6jfRIDPCxQBP0BgV1sN4OJIx0Y0apAGa42loaaCpd4mNrhDgXK3MXRoDlKJn7L+4 vZBoI70Lyw0dQ+yuwqTfxISIxN5zkDNjB9HKYvBPZ24ZJUwnREKTdC+wgWWx/O9Eki0A aDvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNGVPoeAkx0y7nAVOFtQSwZJVESvaPpmb0DAJ14SrS3WYnoPDjrcdU6aQK56heWR+UM X-Received: by 10.28.103.87 with SMTP id b84mr4167983wmc.89.1472841938025; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.53] ([105.189.207.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ux6sm11744922wjc.34.2016.09.02.11.45.35 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:45:37 -0700 (PDT) References: <20160902142912.17297-1-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <20160902142912.17297-2-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <6C8DC7F6-2459-4CD6-A556-3B17A1FBBF5F@linaro.org> <20160902152351.GB4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <20160902180513.GE4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <20160902183215.GG4715@bivouac.eciton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <20160902183215.GG4715@bivouac.eciton.net> Message-Id: <8A4AB213-88D8-4408-9299-3B2AE4B339F9@linaro.org> Cc: edk2-devel-01 , Laszlo Ersek , Michael D Kinney , Liming Gao X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G35) From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:45:26 +0100 To: Leif Lindholm Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg/Misc: Move ARM* BaseMemoryLibStm to MdePkg X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:45:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On 2 sep. 2016, at 19:32, Leif Lindholm wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:11:02PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>> Added the fact that the Stm is not in great shape, I would really >>>> prefer to get rid of it rather than 'promote' it to the standard ARM >>>> implementation. Note that we will need another round of updates to the >>>> platform .DSCs when we remove the Stm version again. >>>=20 >>> My main concern is leaving the master branch unusable for ARM during >>> the Labor Day weekend. If we don't resolve this tonight, with the best >>> will in the world we won't be back to a functioning master before >>> Tuesday evening. >>=20 >> I agree that fixing the branch now would be nice. I just don't >> understand why fixing BaseMemoryLibStm in place is not a better >> solution, especially if we are nuking it anyway next week. That way, >> we have to change all the platforms only a single time. >=20 > Mainly because we don't _know_ that it will be resolved next week and > I'm currently having some trust issues regarding these libraries. >=20 > If that's what it takes to get consensus, sure, I'll go along with > that. I'm fully aware I'm being slightly irrational here. >=20 > So where to now? Just push 2-3 from Wednesday? >=20 Yes, please. On Monday, I will look into adding Arm support to the optdxe fl= avor, and once that is in, we can move all platforms over and deprecate/remo= ve the stm version.