From: "Rothman, Michael A" <michael.a.rothman@intel.com>
To: Tim Lewis <tim.lewis@insyde.com>
Cc: "Carsey, Jaben" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>,
Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: Shell version 2.2
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:46:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8EE61E8F-8085-4D3C-8A99-2CF467695058@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7236196A5DF6C040855A6D96F556A53F3DA697@msmail.insydesw.com.tw>
I think the ver should reflect the spec version on which the shell was built. I'm not sure why it would be 2.1 if built on 2.2 compliant code.
Thanks,
Michael A. Rothman
---------------------------------------------------------------
Let no excuse be a barrier to your success.
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 12:16 PM, Tim Lewis <tim.lewis@insyde.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, but they are the same numbers. So I think this is probably a
>
> The specification says (in the Shell protocol section's Related Defintiions):
>
> #define EFI_SHELL_MAJOR_VERSION 2
> #define EFI_SHELL_MINOR_VERSION 2
>
> And, from ver.c:
>
> ShellPrintHiiEx (
> 0,
> gST->ConOut->Mode->CursorRow,
> NULL,
> STRING_TOKEN (STR_VER_OUTPUT_SIMPLE),
> gShellLevel3HiiHandle,
> gEfiShellProtocol->MajorVersion,
> gEfiShellProtocol->MinorVersion
> );
>
> And the shell protocol instance comes from ShellProtocol.c (see below):
>
> EFI_SHELL_PROTOCOL mShellProtocol = {
> EfiShellExecute,
> EfiShellGetEnv,
> EfiShellSetEnv,
> EfiShellGetAlias,
> EfiShellSetAlias,
> EfiShellGetHelpText,
> EfiShellGetDevicePathFromMap,
> EfiShellGetMapFromDevicePath,
> EfiShellGetDevicePathFromFilePath,
> EfiShellGetFilePathFromDevicePath,
> EfiShellSetMap,
> EfiShellGetCurDir,
> EfiShellSetCurDir,
> EfiShellOpenFileList,
> EfiShellFreeFileList,
> EfiShellRemoveDupInFileList,
> EfiShellBatchIsActive,
> EfiShellIsRootShell,
> EfiShellEnablePageBreak,
> EfiShellDisablePageBreak,
> EfiShellGetPageBreak,
> EfiShellGetDeviceName,
> (EFI_SHELL_GET_FILE_INFO)FileHandleGetInfo, //*
> (EFI_SHELL_SET_FILE_INFO)FileHandleSetInfo, //*
> EfiShellOpenFileByName,
> EfiShellClose,
> EfiShellCreateFile,
> (EFI_SHELL_READ_FILE)FileHandleRead, //*
> (EFI_SHELL_WRITE_FILE)FileHandleWrite, //*
> (EFI_SHELL_DELETE_FILE)FileHandleDelete, //*
> EfiShellDeleteFileByName,
> (EFI_SHELL_GET_FILE_POSITION)FileHandleGetPosition, //*
> (EFI_SHELL_SET_FILE_POSITION)FileHandleSetPosition, //*
> (EFI_SHELL_FLUSH_FILE)FileHandleFlush, //*
> EfiShellFindFiles,
> EfiShellFindFilesInDir,
> (EFI_SHELL_GET_FILE_SIZE)FileHandleGetSize, //*
> EfiShellOpenRoot,
> EfiShellOpenRootByHandle,
> NULL,
> SHELL_MAJOR_VERSION,
> SHELL_MINOR_VERSION,
>
> // New for UEFI Shell 2.1
> EfiShellRegisterGuidName,
> EfiShellGetGuidName,
> EfiShellGetGuidFromName,
> EfiShellGetEnvEx
> };
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Carsey, Jaben
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 12:10 PM
> To: Tim Lewis <tim.lewis@insyde.com>; Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
> Cc: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Shell version 2.2
>
> Tim,
>
> Yes, ver command would output that the version of the shell is different.
>
> The #define below is specifically the version of the Protocol, not the version of the spec.
>
> It could have been a miss on the part of the committee, but that was hoe I interpreted the non-change to the protocol version.
>
> -Jaben
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tim Lewis [mailto:tim.lewis@insyde.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 11:36 AM
>> To: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.carsey@intel.com>; Meenakshi Aggarwal
>> <meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org <edk2-
>> devel@ml01.01.org>
>> Subject: RE: Shell version 2.2
>> Importance: High
>>
>> Jaben --
>>
>> Are there no shell commands where the standard command-line parameters
>> have changed?
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>> Carsey, Jaben
>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:26 AM
>> To: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@nxp.com>; edk2-
>> devel@lists.01.org <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
>> Cc: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] Shell version 2.2
>>
>> I think that that version (2.1) is correct for the version of the
>> protocol. The protocol API was not changed for the UEFI Shell 2.2.
>>
>> That is the current version and should support the 2.2 spec.
>>
>> -Jaben
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf
>>> Of Meenakshi Aggarwal
>>> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:20 AM
>>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
>>> Subject: [edk2] Shell version 2.2
>>> Importance: High
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I can see UEFI shell specification 2.2
>>> (http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Shell_2_2.pd
>>> f) is available, But on edk2 master branch current version of Shell
>>> is still showing
>> 2.1.
>>>
>>> File:ShellPkg/Include/Protocol/EfiShell.h
>>>
>>> enum ShellVersion {
>>> SHELL_MAJOR_VERSION = 2,
>>> SHELL_MINOR_VERSION = 1
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please tell if I am looking at correct file, actually I want to
>>> update my shell to 2.2, but it looks like edk2 master branch doesn't
>>> support shell
>> specification 2.2.
>>>
>>> Is my understanding correct?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> Meenakshi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-05 9:20 Shell version 2.2 Meenakshi Aggarwal
2016-08-05 17:26 ` Carsey, Jaben
2016-08-05 18:36 ` Tim Lewis
2016-08-05 19:09 ` Carsey, Jaben
2016-08-05 19:16 ` Tim Lewis
2016-08-05 19:34 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2016-08-05 19:46 ` Rothman, Michael A [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8EE61E8F-8085-4D3C-8A99-2CF467695058@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox