From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
To: "Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Steve.Capper@arm.com" <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
"ryan.harkin@linaro.org" <ryan.harkin@linaro.org>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] MdePkg IndustryStandard/Scsi.h: Add sense code macro
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:23:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e55d3fc-f59a-dfbf-c0e3-8f605488de97@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7F1BAD85ADEA444D97065A60D2E97EE5699B5197@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi,
On 02/24/2017 12:42 AM, Tian, Feng wrote:
> Linton,
>
> Could you let me know where the +#define EFI_SCSI_REQUEST_SENSE_ERROR (0x70) comes from?
Its being anded with the response code field in an attempt to pick off
0x70..0x72 as a sanity check that the response data looks valid given
that its also long enough to be a valid return.
So, your right its not well named either. Likely as its just a debug
print, the best plan is to drop the whole thing, particularly since the
transport code is now stable enough that the sense data is usually valid.
>
> According to SCSI SPC5r08 spec, the first byte of sense data is the RESPONSE CODE field.
>
> And 0x70 means
>
> a) the result of an error, exception condition, or protocol specific failure that is associated with CHECK
> CONDITION status; or
> b) additional information that is associated with a status other than CHECK CONDITION.
>
> It's possible that 0x70 means success... so this naming may be not quite appropriate.
>
> And in your usage, you forcedly convert Packet->SenseData to UINT8 and access each sense data field by array index. I think it's unnecessary. Packet->SenseData is EFI_SCSI_SENSE_DATA type, which has defined the meaning of each field. With this structure, you don't need introduce EFI_SCSI_SK_VALUE macro again.
>
> + sense = (UINT8 *)Packet->SenseData;
> + if ((Packet->SenseDataLength > 13) &&
> + (sense[0] & EFI_SCSI_REQUEST_SENSE_ERROR)) {
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "SiI3132ScsiPassRead() Key %X ASC(Q) %02X%02X\n",
> + EFI_SCSI_SK_VALUE (sense[2]), sense[12], sense[13]));
> + }
>
> Thanks
> Feng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Linton
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 6:34 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Steve.Capper@arm.com; ryan.harkin@linaro.org; leif.lindholm@linaro.org; linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v3 2/7] MdePkg IndustryStandard/Scsi.h: Add sense code macro
>
> Add some definitions to mask the sense key from sense data, and check the validity of the returned sense data.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Scsi.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Scsi.h b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Scsi.h
> index 0d81314..802479e 100644
> --- a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Scsi.h
> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Scsi.h
> @@ -369,6 +369,8 @@ typedef struct {
> //
> // Sense Key
> //
> +#define EFI_SCSI_REQUEST_SENSE_ERROR (0x70)
> +#define EFI_SCSI_SK_VALUE(byte) (byte&0x0F)
> #define EFI_SCSI_SK_NO_SENSE (0x0)
> #define EFI_SCSI_SK_RECOVERY_ERROR (0x1)
> #define EFI_SCSI_SK_NOT_READY (0x2)
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 22:33 [PATCH v3 0/7] ATAPI support on SiI SATA adapter Jeremy Linton
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] EmbeddedPkg: SiI3132: Note that ARM is using this Dxe Jeremy Linton
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] MdePkg IndustryStandard/Scsi.h: Add sense code macro Jeremy Linton
2017-02-24 6:42 ` Tian, Feng
2017-02-24 18:23 ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] EmbeddedPkg: SiI3132: Add ScsiProtocol callbacks Jeremy Linton
2017-02-24 17:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-03 1:05 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] EmbeddedPkg: SiI3132: Add SCSI protocol support to header Jeremy Linton
2017-02-24 17:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] EmbeddedPkg: SiI3132: Break out FIS command submission Jeremy Linton
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] EmbeddedPkg: SiI3132: Cleanup device node creation Jeremy Linton
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] EmbeddedPkg: SiI3132: Enable SCSI pass-through protocol Jeremy Linton
2017-02-23 22:33 ` [PATCH] Platforms/ARM/Juno: Add " Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e55d3fc-f59a-dfbf-c0e3-8f605488de97@arm.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox