public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Stephano Cetola" <stephano.cetola@intel.com>,
	"Brian Richardson" <brian.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	"Michael Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	yuchenlin <yuchenlin@synology.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Phil Dennis-Jordan" <phil@philjordan.eu>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: [urgent] Soft Feature Freeze has started since Nov.1 for dk2-stable201811
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:46:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ff81475-1712-86b0-a96e-0f281bc4a734@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01176b5b-8826-2c82-beef-45250fd88bef@redhat.com>

+ Yuchenlin, + Gerd, + both Phils

On 11/07/18 20:13, Laszlo Ersek wrote:

>>> For example, I reviewed and pushed 4 patches yesterday (on 2018-Nov-06):
>>>
>>>   1  e038bde2679b Revert "OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: list "UnalignedIoInternal.h" in the INF file"
>>>   2  98856a724c2a Revert "OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: VMWare SVGA device support"
>>>   3  438ada5aa5a1 Revert "OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: Helper functions for unaligned port I/O."
>>>   4  328409ce8de7 Revert "OvmfPkg: VMWare SVGA display device register definitions"
>>>
>>> which are the first four patches (out of five) from the following
>>> series:
>>>
>>>   [edk2] [PATCH v2 0/5] OvmfPkg: simply use the Bochs interface for vmsvga
>>>
>>> These reverts are arguably not bugfixes; they are preparation for
>>> re-implementing a feature from scratch (the last patch in that series).
>>> Thus, had I known we were already in the Soft Feature Freeze, I wouldn't
>>> have pushed them, because the review was not complete before the soft
>>> freeze start.
>>>
>>> But I had just returned from a week (or more) of PTO, there was no
>>> announcement on the list yet, and I didn't remember the wiki page.
>>>
>>> (In the technical sense, the reverts are not disruptive, luckily; they
>>> remove code that is dead anyway.)

I've given this more thought.

The reverts indeed remove dead code, but the code in question is dead
*only* on QEMU v2.10+. On QEMU v2.9 and earlier, the code is not dead.

(See the original discussion in the thread "[edk2] [PATCH] OvmfPkg:
initialize bochs when initializing vmsvga".)

This means that, with only the first four patches applied from the
series (= the reverts), and with the fifth patch (= the clean
re-implementation of the feature) postponed, people running
edk2-stable201811 on *old* -- v2.9 or older -- QEMU, with VMW SVGA, will
suffer a regression.

So that leaves me with a question. Should I revert the first four
patches now, for edk2-stable201811? (I.e., revert the reverts -->
re-instate the incorrect VMW SVGA driver impl, that happens to work on
v2.9 and earlier.)

... Note that upstream QEMU no longer supports (= maintains stable
branches) for v2.9 and earlier releases. The QEMU homepage
<https://www.qemu.org/> currently advertizes:
- 3.1.0-rc0
- 3.0.0
- 2.12.1
- 2.11.2

Personally I'm leaning towards keeping the reverts for
edk2-stable201811. (v2.9 is really old, and the VMW SVGA device model is
virtually unused.) For my professional integrity though, I must ask this
question publicly.

Thanks
Laszlo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-09 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-07  1:12 Soft Feature Freeze has started since Nov.1 for dk2-stable201811 Gao, Liming
2018-11-07 15:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-07 15:38   ` Leif Lindholm
2018-11-07 19:13     ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-08  2:02       ` Zeng, Star
2018-11-08  5:39         ` Gao, Liming
2018-11-08 13:09           ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-08 13:57             ` Gao, Liming
2018-11-08 17:13               ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-09 16:46       ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-11-09 18:08         ` [urgent] " Leif Lindholm
2018-11-09 19:08         ` Phil Dennis-Jordan
2018-11-09 19:32           ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ff81475-1712-86b0-a96e-0f281bc4a734@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox