Thanks for pointing this, yes, this change actually replaces structure field from FeaturesCompat to FeaturesRoCompat. The commit message was already corrected in referenced repository fork.

> On 27 Jan 2023, at 16:02, Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@posteo.de> wrote:
> 
> The actual issue appears to be FeaturesCompat vs FeaturesRoCompat (latter is hidden by your usage of the macro). Checking for != 0 is redundant (albeit required by the code style guideline for non-functional reasons). Please confirm and update the commit message if you agree.