Thanks for pointing this, yes, this change actually replaces structure field from FeaturesCompat to FeaturesRoCompat. The commit message was already corrected in referenced repository fork.

On 27 Jan 2023, at 16:02, Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@posteo.de> wrote:

The actual issue appears to be FeaturesCompat vs FeaturesRoCompat (latter is hidden by your usage of the macro). Checking for != 0 is redundant (albeit required by the code style guideline for non-functional reasons). Please confirm and update the commit message if you agree.