From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.12556.1577977687520869718
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Thu, 02 Jan 2020 07:08:07 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NAuJ9tEX;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 207.211.31.81, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1577977686;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=ilt3w+ZVCBI6qUIuHtJ4Iy75HKGZjtrsAFZmWpwETHw=;
	b=NAuJ9tEXb6C/BVuIyX5s7UVxrwpqbZl2Ap0WujJwacKeIpcF3YtzpPIR2X87A5WNhbJBaT
	Y2hOh0olBs1HtmBnARy/UKPEo+G89y1J4sNSjkxYXLLUuL7G3NpV5NxRLK0OwEJY89n2qG
	/lOlsfr5dkQlbBiJ+LYpkSYyxku6LhE=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-231-k5MuRaV-NYus9PqG1N7XnA-1; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 10:08:03 -0500
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E1D10060E5;
	Thu,  2 Jan 2020 15:08:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-117-90.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.90])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A0519C4F;
	Thu,  2 Jan 2020 15:08:00 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations
To: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
 "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
 "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>, "Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
 "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
References: <20191231004914.8520-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>
 <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C3D0651@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C98DA40@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <93c482ce-808d-4257-dc49-c60b1ec03059@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:07:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C98DA40@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23
X-MC-Unique: k5MuRaV-NYus9PqG1N7XnA-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 01/02/20 04:12, Wu, Hao A wrote:
> Ray and Eric, thanks a lot for the review.
> 
> Hello Laszlo,
> It seems that you are out of office, I plan to push the series without your
> comments first. If you have feedbacks/comments with regard to the series, I
> will follow up for the potential refine/revert of the series.

Just returned today. I'm now working to regain control of my mailbox.

The above procedure works fine for me; in fact I would have suggested it
myself. In case I encounter a regression with OVMF, I'll report it.

Thank you!
Laszlo