From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Bi, Dandan" <dandan.bi@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"Carsey, Jaben" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>,
Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Plan to delete ShellBinPkg from edk2/master
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:49:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9492a5a0-58fc-4e49-4645-0593aa758660@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C0D5C461C9E904E8F62152F6274C0BB40BB5D6F@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 04/02/19 07:38, Bi, Dandan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> ShellBinPkg is the remaining binary package in Edk2 repo. We plan to delete ShellBinPkg from edk2/master, and keep source ShellPkg only in edk2 repo.
> Before the deletion, I will update the existing consumers in Edk2 and Edk2Platforms to use ShellPkg directly.
>
> If you have any concern please raise here before mid-April . If there is no concern, I will create patches for this task after mid-April.
>
> Bugzilla for this task:
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
(adding a few CC's)
I think we should not remove ShellBinPkg without a replacement *somehwere*.
A shell binary that is built from a validated edk2 tree, with a set of
library resolutions and PCD settings that are known to keep platform
dependencies *out* of the shell binary, is extremely useful.
IIRC, Andrew suggested earlier that we should treat the shell even as an
"OS", with better compatibility standards than we currently maintain.
I think we should only remove ShellBinPkg if we permanently offer a
separate download location instead, and we rebuild the shell binary from
"ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc" at every stable tag.
In that case, removing ShellBinPkg would indeed improve the edk2 tree,
in my opinion.
Thanks,
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 5:38 [RFC] Plan to delete ShellBinPkg from edk2/master Bi, Dandan
2019-04-02 8:49 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-04-02 9:12 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-04-02 11:29 ` Ryszard Knop
2019-04-02 11:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-02 11:50 ` Ryszard Knop
2019-04-02 12:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-03 2:17 ` Ni, Ray
2019-04-03 10:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-03 15:49 ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-04-03 16:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-03 21:47 ` [edk2] " Michael D Kinney
2019-04-04 3:42 ` ray.ni
2019-04-04 4:09 ` [edk2-devel] " Andrew Fish
2019-04-04 10:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-04 15:10 ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-04 16:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-04 16:36 ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-08 8:08 ` Dandan Bi
2019-04-15 14:58 ` Liming Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9492a5a0-58fc-4e49-4645-0593aa758660@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox