public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: alloc RxBuf using AllocateSharedPages()
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:06:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <959544e1-d15d-7dab-76fb-67c887379f81@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504265045-19008-3-git-send-email-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

Looks like I'm slowly getting to the 2nd patch after all:

On 09/01/17 13:24, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> When device is behind the IOMMU, VirtioNetDxe is required to use the
> device address in bus master operations. RxBuf is allocated using
> AllocatePool() which returns the system physical address.
> 
> The patch uses VIRTIO_DEVICE_PROTOCOL.AllocateSharedPage() to allocate
> the RxBuf and map with BusMasterCommonBuffer so that we can obtain the
> device address for RxBuf.

(1) the "AllocateSharedPage" member function is called
"AllocateSharedPages" (plural)


(2) since we mention mapping, it's probably best to mention the helper
function that we use -- VirtioMapAllBytesInSharedBuffer()


> 
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> ---
>  OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet.h        |  3 +
>  OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/Events.c           |  6 ++
>  OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpInitialize.c    | 75 ++++++++++++++++----
>  OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpSharedHelpers.c |  7 +-
>  4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet.h b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet.h
> index d80d441b50a4..7df51bd044f5 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet.h
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>    Protocol instances for virtio-net devices.
>  
>    Copyright (C) 2013, Red Hat, Inc.
> +  Copyright (c) 2017, AMD Inc, All rights reserved.<BR>
>  
>    This program and the accompanying materials are licensed and made available
>    under the terms and conditions of the BSD License which accompanies this
> @@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ typedef struct {
>    VOID                        *RxRingMap;        // VirtioRingMap
>    UINT8                       *RxBuf;            // VirtioNetInitRx
>    UINT16                      RxLastUsed;        // VirtioNetInitRx
> +  UINTN                       RxBufNoPages;      // VirtioNetInitRx
> +  VOID                        *RxBufMap;         // VirtioMapSharedBuffer

(3) The comment on both new fields should be "VirtioNetInitRx".


(4) Please rename "RxBufNoPages" to "RxBufNrPages".

("RxBufNumberOfPages" would be too long for this table, and its "mixed
verbosity" wouldn't be consistent with the rest of the fields.)


>  
>    VRING                       TxRing;            // VirtioNetInitRing
>    VOID                        *TxRingMap;        // VirtioRingMap

(5) I guess I can add this remark here, about the documentation:

I've now re-read "TechNotes.txt", until the end of the

  Virtio internals -- Rx

section (i.e. I stopped just before "Virtio internals -- Tx"). I think
that this section needs to be updated in one spot only; namely the
expression

  (guest-physical) addresses of these sub-slices

should be replaced with

  (device-mapped) addresses of these sub-slices

Please include such an update in this patch.


> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/Events.c b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/Events.c
> index 6950c4d56df1..0586a82cdf09 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/Events.c
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/Events.c
> @@ -95,4 +95,10 @@ VirtioNetExitBoot (
>    //
>    Dev->VirtIo->UnmapSharedBuffer (Dev->VirtIo, Dev->TxRingMap);
>    Dev->VirtIo->UnmapSharedBuffer (Dev->VirtIo, Dev->RxRingMap);
> +
> +  //
> +  // Unmap Rx buffer so that hypervisor will not be able get readable data after
> +  // device is reset.
> +  //
> +  Dev->VirtIo->UnmapSharedBuffer (Dev->VirtIo, Dev->RxBufMap);
>  }

(6) My earlier comment applies; the RX structures are erected in
VirtioNetInitialize() --> VirtioNetInitRx(), so they are only available
in EfiSimpleNetworkInitialized state.


> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpInitialize.c b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpInitialize.c
> index 803a38bd4239..6052d40fc6cb 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpInitialize.c
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpInitialize.c
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ VirtioNetInitTx (
>    @param[in,out] Dev       The VNET_DEV driver instance about to enter the
>                             EfiSimpleNetworkInitialized state.
>  
> -  @retval EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES  Failed to allocate RX destination area.
> +  @retval EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES  Failed to allocate or map RX destination area.
>    @return                       Status codes from VIRTIO_CFG_WRITE().
>    @retval EFI_SUCCESS           RX setup successful. The device is live and may
>                                  already be writing to the receive area.
> @@ -249,13 +249,17 @@ VirtioNetInitRx (
>    IN OUT VNET_DEV *Dev
>    )
>  {
> -  EFI_STATUS Status;
> -  UINTN      VirtioNetReqSize;
> -  UINTN      RxBufSize;
> -  UINT16     RxAlwaysPending;
> -  UINTN      PktIdx;
> -  UINT16     DescIdx;
> -  UINT8      *RxPtr;
> +  EFI_STATUS            Status;
> +  UINTN                 VirtioNetReqSize;
> +  UINTN                 RxBufSize;
> +  UINT16                RxAlwaysPending;
> +  UINTN                 PktIdx;
> +  UINT16                DescIdx;
> +  UINT8                 *RxPtr;
> +  UINTN                 NumBytes;
> +  EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS  RxBufDeviceAddress;
> +  UINT64                BufBaseShift;
> +  VOID                  *RxBuffer;
>  
>    //
>    // In VirtIo 1.0, the NumBuffers field is mandatory. In 0.9.5, it depends on
> @@ -280,11 +284,40 @@ VirtioNetInitRx (
>    //
>    RxAlwaysPending = (UINT16) MIN (Dev->RxRing.QueueSize / 2, VNET_MAX_PENDING);
>  
> -  Dev->RxBuf = AllocatePool (RxAlwaysPending * RxBufSize);
> -  if (Dev->RxBuf == NULL) {
> +  //
> +  // The RxBuf is shared between guest and hypervisor, use
> +  // AllocateSharedPages() to allocate this memory region and map it with
> +  // BusMasterCommonBuffer so that it can be accessed by both guest and
> +  // hypervisor.
> +  //
> +  NumBytes = RxAlwaysPending * RxBufSize;
> +  Dev->RxBufNoPages = EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (NumBytes);
> +  Status = Dev->VirtIo->AllocateSharedPages (
> +                          Dev->VirtIo,
> +                          Dev->RxBufNoPages,
> +                          &RxBuffer
> +                          );
> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>      return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
>    }

(7) I suggest propagating Status here, and updating the comment block
above accordingly.


>  
> +  Status = VirtioMapAllBytesInSharedBuffer (
> +             Dev->VirtIo,
> +             VirtioOperationBusMasterCommonBuffer,
> +             RxBuffer,
> +             NumBytes,
> +             &RxBufDeviceAddress,
> +             &Dev->RxBufMap
> +             );
> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> +    Status = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;

(8) Same here, I suggest propagating the status code, and updating the
leading comment block.


> +    goto FreeSharedBuffer;
> +  }
> +
> +  Dev->RxBuf = RxBuffer;
> +
> +  BufBaseShift = (UINT64) (UINTN)Dev->RxBuf - (UINT64) RxBufDeviceAddress;
> +
>    //
>    // virtio-0.9.5, 2.4.2 Receiving Used Buffers From the Device
>    //
> @@ -306,6 +339,11 @@ VirtioNetInitRx (
>    DescIdx = 0;
>    RxPtr = Dev->RxBuf;
>    for (PktIdx = 0; PktIdx < RxAlwaysPending; ++PktIdx) {
> +    UINT64    Address;
> +
> +    Address = (UINTN) RxPtr;
> +    Address += BufBaseShift;
> +

(9) Please remove the following local variables: "BufBaseShift" (new),
"Address" (new), "RxPtr" (old).


(10) In "VirtioNet.h", please introduce a new field as follows:

  EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS        RxBufDeviceBase;   // VirtioNetInitRx


(11) Rather than the "RxBufDeviceAddress" local variable, the
"Dev->RxBufDeviceBase" field should receive the mapped address in this
function.


(12) The "RxBufDeviceAddress" (new) local variable should be preserved,
and it should take the role of the current "RxPtr" variable. Namely, it
should be
- set to "Dev->RxBufDeviceBase" before the loop,
- incremented in the loop,
- and assigned to the "Addr" field.


(13) And now, the explanation for all of the above: in this patch you
missed the VirtioNetReceive() function, in "SnpReceive.c". In that
function, we currently have

  RxPtr = (UINT8 *)(UINTN) Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx + 1].Addr;

In this patch, the "Addr" field has to be reverse-mapped, like this:

  UINTN RxBufOffset;

  RxBufOffset = (UINTN)(Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx + 1].Addr -
                        Dev->RxBufDeviceBase);
  RxPtr = Dev->RxBuf + RxBufOffset;

(No change to the rest of the code in VirtioNetReceive().)


>      //
>      // virtio-0.9.5, 2.4.1.2 Updating the Available Ring
>      // invisible to the host until we update the Index Field
> @@ -315,13 +353,13 @@ VirtioNetInitRx (
>      //
>      // virtio-0.9.5, 2.4.1.1 Placing Buffers into the Descriptor Table
>      //
> -    Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Addr  = (UINTN) RxPtr;
> +    Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Addr  = Address;
>      Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Len   = (UINT32) VirtioNetReqSize;
>      Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Flags = VRING_DESC_F_WRITE | VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
>      Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Next  = (UINT16) (DescIdx + 1);
>      RxPtr += Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx++].Len;
>  
> -    Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Addr  = (UINTN) RxPtr;
> +    Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Addr  = Address;
>      Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Len   = (UINT32) (RxBufSize - VirtioNetReqSize);
>      Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx].Flags = VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
>      RxPtr += Dev->RxRing.Desc[DescIdx++].Len;
> @@ -345,10 +383,21 @@ VirtioNetInitRx (
>    Status = Dev->VirtIo->SetQueueNotify (Dev->VirtIo, VIRTIO_NET_Q_RX);
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>      Dev->VirtIo->SetDeviceStatus (Dev->VirtIo, 0);
> -    FreePool (Dev->RxBuf);
> +    goto UnmapSharedBuffer;
>    }
>  
>    return Status;
> +
> +UnmapSharedBuffer:
> +  Dev->VirtIo->UnmapSharedBuffer (Dev->VirtIo, Dev->RxBufMap);
> +
> +FreeSharedBuffer:
> +  Dev->VirtIo->FreeSharedPages (
> +                 Dev->VirtIo,
> +                 Dev->RxBufNoPages,
> +                 (VOID *) Dev->RxBuf
> +                 );

(14) The last argument is incorrect. If you jump here because
VirtioMapAllBytesInSharedBuffer() fails, then Dev->RxBuf is not set yet,
only RxBuffer. Please say RxBuffer.


> +  return Status;
>  }
>  
>  
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpSharedHelpers.c b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpSharedHelpers.c
> index 9fedb72fdbd4..4c9d9ece0790 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpSharedHelpers.c
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpSharedHelpers.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,12 @@ VirtioNetShutdownRx (
>    IN OUT VNET_DEV *Dev
>    )
>  {
> -  FreePool (Dev->RxBuf);
> +  Dev->VirtIo->UnmapSharedBuffer (Dev->VirtIo, Dev->RxBufMap);
> +  Dev->VirtIo->FreeSharedPages (
> +                 Dev->VirtIo,
> +                 Dev->RxBufNoPages,
> +                 (VOID *) Dev->RxBuf
> +                 );
>  }

(15) There's no need for the explicit (VOID*) cast.

Thanks!
Laszlo


  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-05 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-01 11:24 [PATCH 0/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: map host address to device address Brijesh Singh
2017-09-01 11:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: map VRING using VirtioRingMap() Brijesh Singh
2017-09-05 11:47   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-05 18:57     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-05 20:17       ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-05 21:11         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-09-05 21:59           ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-05 22:18             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-09-05 22:37               ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-05 23:03                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-09-01 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: alloc RxBuf using AllocateSharedPages() Brijesh Singh
2017-09-05 15:06   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-09-01 11:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: dynamically alloc transmit header Brijesh Singh
2017-09-06  9:11   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-01 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: map virtio-net transmit request buffer Brijesh Singh
2017-09-05 12:41   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-05 12:44     ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-06  8:11     ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-01 11:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: negotiate VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM Brijesh Singh
2017-09-06  7:33   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-09-07 22:55 ` [PATCH 0/5] OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: map host address to device address Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=959544e1-d15d-7dab-76fb-67c887379f81@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox