From: "Javeed, Ashraf" <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry standard registers
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:24:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95C5C2B113DE604FB208120C742E9824578BE96A@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E4BE088@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Liming,
The existing structure are extended in PCI Express Base Specification Revision 4; hence I have made the change in PciExpress21.h.
Thanks
Ashraf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:35 PM
> To: Javeed, Ashraf <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry standard
> registers
>
> Ashraf:
> So, those update base on PCI Express Base Specification Revision 4.0. If new
> definitions are in version 4.0, they can be added into PciExpress40.h. If the
> existing structure is extended, they can be kept in PciExpress21.h.
>
> Thanks
> Liming
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Javeed, Ashraf
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 2:26 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
> > <liming.gao@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A
> > <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry standard
> > registers
> >
> > BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007
> > The PCIe Device capability register #2
> > (PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY2) needs to be upgraded for the PCI
> > features like - LN system CLS, 10b Tag completer/requester register
> > fields, emergency power reduction support and initialization requirement, and
> FRS support.
> >
> > The PCIe Device Control register #2 (PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CONTROL2)
> > needs to be upgraded for the - emergency power reduction request
> > enabling and also the 10b Extended Tag enabling.
> >
> > Needs macro definitions for all the ranges of Maximum Payload Sizes
> > and Maximum Read Request Sizes defined
> >
> > Needs macro definitions for all the ranges of Completion Timeout range
> > needs to be defined.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ashraf Javeed <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>
> > Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h | 39
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > index d4003de74c..e652e77a1e 100644
> > --- a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > +++ b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > @@ -91,6 +91,24 @@ typedef union {
> > UINT16 Uint16;
> > } PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CONTROL;
> >
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_128B 0
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_256B 1
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_512B 2
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_1024B 3 #define
> > +PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_2048B 4 #define
> PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_4096B 5
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_RVSD1 6 #define
> > +PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_RVSD2 7
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_128B 0
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_256B 1
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_512B 2
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_1024B 3
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_2048B 4
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_4096B 5
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_RVSD1 6
> > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_RVSD2 7
> > +
> > typedef union {
> > struct {
> > UINT16 CorrectableError : 1;
> > @@ -250,16 +268,30 @@ typedef union {
> > UINT32 NoRoEnabledPrPrPassing : 1;
> > UINT32 LtrMechanism : 1;
> > UINT32 TphCompleter : 2;
> > - UINT32 Reserved : 4;
> > + UINT32 LnSystemCLS : 2;
> > + UINT32 TenBitTagCompleterSupported : 1;
> > + UINT32 TenBitTagRequesterSupported : 1;
> > UINT32 Obff : 2;
> > UINT32 ExtendedFmtField : 1;
> > UINT32 EndEndTlpPrefix : 1;
> > UINT32 MaxEndEndTlpPrefixes : 2;
> > - UINT32 Reserved2 : 8;
> > + UINT32 EmergencyPowerReductionSupported : 2;
> > + UINT32 EmergencyPowerReductionInitializationRequired : 1;
> > + UINT32 Reserved : 4;
> > + UINT32 FrsSupported : 1;
> > } Bits;
> > UINT32 Uint32;
> > } PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY2;
> >
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_NOT_SUPPORTED 0
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_SUPPORTED 1
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_B_SUPPORTED 2
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_B_SUPPORTED 3
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_B_C_SUPPORTED 6
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_B_C_SUPPORTED 7
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_B_C_D_SUPPORTED 14
> > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_B_C_D_SUPPORTED 15
> > +
> > #define PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_OBFF_MESSAGE BIT0
> > #define PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_OBFF_WAKE BIT1
> >
> > @@ -273,7 +305,8 @@ typedef union {
> > UINT16 IdoRequest : 1;
> > UINT16 IdoCompletion : 1;
> > UINT16 LtrMechanism : 2;
> > - UINT16 Reserved : 2;
> > + UINT16 EmergencyPowerReductionRequest : 1;
> > + UINT16 TenBitTagRequesterEnable : 1;
> > UINT16 Obff : 2;
> > UINT16 EndEndTlpPrefixBlocking : 1;
> > } Bits;
> > --
> > 2.21.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-22 6:26 [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry standard registers Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 14:04 ` Liming Gao
2019-07-25 14:24 ` Javeed, Ashraf [this message]
2019-07-25 14:35 ` Liming Gao
2019-07-25 15:29 ` Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 15:35 ` Liming Gao
2019-07-25 16:04 ` Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 16:22 ` Liming Gao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-25 17:57 Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 18:16 Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 18:23 Javeed, Ashraf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95C5C2B113DE604FB208120C742E9824578BE96A@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox