From: "Javeed, Ashraf" <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry standard registers
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:04:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95C5C2B113DE604FB208120C742E9824578BEAC8@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E4C01A7@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Liming,
The following are the 2 points summarizing the changes as per spec 4, and it is already part of commit message...
> > > > > The PCIe Device capability register #2
> > > > > (PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY2) needs to be upgraded for
> > > > > the PCI features like - LN system CLS, 10b Tag
> > > > > completer/requester register fields, emergency power reduction
> > > > > support and initialization requirement, and
> > > > FRS support.
> > > > >
> > > > > The PCIe Device Control register #2
> > > > > (PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CONTROL2) needs to be upgraded for the -
> > > > > emergency power reduction request enabling and also the 10b Extended Tag enabling.
Thanks
Ashraf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 9:06 PM
> To: Javeed, Ashraf <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry standard
> registers
>
> That make sense. In the commit message, can you update the message to
> describe which change bases on PCI Express Base Specification Revision 4.0?
>
> Thanks
> Liming
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Javeed, Ashraf
> > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 11:30 PM
> > To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> > <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry
> > standard registers
> >
> > These new macros definitions define PCI attributes which exist in the
> > PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.1; hence placing this in the
> PciExpress21.h align with the specification revision.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ashraf
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gao, Liming
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 8:05 PM
> > > To: Javeed, Ashraf <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> > > <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry
> > > standard registers
> > >
> > > I agree the structure update in PciExpress21.h. I also see some new
> > > macro definitions. Can they be added to PciExpress40.h, for example:
> > >
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_128B 0
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_256B 1
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_512B 2
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_1024B 3 #define
> > > PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_2048B 4 #define
> PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_4096B
> > > 5 #define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_RVSD1 6 #define
> > > PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_RVSD2 7
> > >
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_128B 0
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_256B 1
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_512B 2
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_1024B 3
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_2048B 4
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_4096B 5
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_RVSD1 6
> > > #define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_RVSD2 7
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Liming
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Javeed, Ashraf
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 10:24 PM
> > > > To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> > > > <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry
> > > > standard registers
> > > >
> > > > Liming,
> > > > The existing structure are extended in PCI Express Base
> > > > Specification Revision
> > > 4; hence I have made the change in PciExpress21.h.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Ashraf
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Gao, Liming
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:35 PM
> > > > > To: Javeed, Ashraf <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>;
> > > > > devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > > Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> > > > > <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe
> > > > > industry standard registers
> > > > >
> > > > > Ashraf:
> > > > > So, those update base on PCI Express Base Specification
> > > > > Revision 4.0. If new definitions are in version 4.0, they can be
> > > > > added into PciExpress40.h. If the existing structure is
> > > > > extended, they can be kept in
> > > PciExpress21.h.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Liming
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Javeed, Ashraf
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 2:26 PM
> > > > > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > > > Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao,
> > > > > > Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Wu,
> > > > > > Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry
> > > > > > standard registers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007
> > > > > > The PCIe Device capability register #2
> > > > > > (PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY2) needs to be upgraded for
> > > > > > the PCI features like - LN system CLS, 10b Tag
> > > > > > completer/requester register fields, emergency power reduction
> > > > > > support and initialization requirement, and
> > > > > FRS support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The PCIe Device Control register #2
> > > > > > (PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CONTROL2) needs to be upgraded for the -
> > > > > > emergency power reduction request enabling and also the 10b
> Extended Tag enabling.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Needs macro definitions for all the ranges of Maximum Payload
> > > > > > Sizes and Maximum Read Request Sizes defined
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Needs macro definitions for all the ranges of Completion
> > > > > > Timeout range needs to be defined.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ashraf Javeed <ashraf.javeed@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h | 39
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > > > > > b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > > > > > index d4003de74c..e652e77a1e 100644
> > > > > > --- a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > > > > > +++ b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/PciExpress21.h
> > > > > > @@ -91,6 +91,24 @@ typedef union {
> > > > > > UINT16 Uint16;
> > > > > > } PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CONTROL;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_128B 0
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_256B 1
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_512B 2
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_1024B 3 #define
> > > > > > +PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_2048B 4 #define
> > > > > PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_4096B 5
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_RVSD1 6 #define
> > > > > > +PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_RVSD2 7
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_128B 0
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_256B 1
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_512B 2
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_1024B 3
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_2048B 4
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_4096B 5
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_RVSD1 6
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_MAX_READ_REQ_SIZE_RVSD2 7
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > typedef union {
> > > > > > struct {
> > > > > > UINT16 CorrectableError : 1; @@ -250,16 +268,30 @@
> > > > > > typedef union {
> > > > > > UINT32 NoRoEnabledPrPrPassing : 1;
> > > > > > UINT32 LtrMechanism : 1;
> > > > > > UINT32 TphCompleter : 2;
> > > > > > - UINT32 Reserved : 4;
> > > > > > + UINT32 LnSystemCLS : 2;
> > > > > > + UINT32 TenBitTagCompleterSupported : 1;
> > > > > > + UINT32 TenBitTagRequesterSupported : 1;
> > > > > > UINT32 Obff : 2;
> > > > > > UINT32 ExtendedFmtField : 1;
> > > > > > UINT32 EndEndTlpPrefix : 1;
> > > > > > UINT32 MaxEndEndTlpPrefixes : 2;
> > > > > > - UINT32 Reserved2 : 8;
> > > > > > + UINT32 EmergencyPowerReductionSupported : 2;
> > > > > > + UINT32 EmergencyPowerReductionInitializationRequired : 1;
> > > > > > + UINT32 Reserved : 4;
> > > > > > + UINT32 FrsSupported : 1;
> > > > > > } Bits;
> > > > > > UINT32 Uint32;
> > > > > > } PCI_REG_PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY2;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_NOT_SUPPORTED 0
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_SUPPORTED 1
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_B_SUPPORTED 2
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_B_SUPPORTED 3
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_B_C_SUPPORTED 6
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_B_C_SUPPORTED
> 7
> > > > > > +#define PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_B_C_D_SUPPORTED
> 14
> > > > > > +#define
> PCIE_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_RANGE_A_B_C_D_SUPPORTED 15
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > #define PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_OBFF_MESSAGE BIT0
> > > > > > #define PCIE_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_OBFF_WAKE BIT1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -273,7 +305,8 @@ typedef union {
> > > > > > UINT16 IdoRequest : 1;
> > > > > > UINT16 IdoCompletion : 1;
> > > > > > UINT16 LtrMechanism : 2;
> > > > > > - UINT16 Reserved : 2;
> > > > > > + UINT16 EmergencyPowerReductionRequest : 1;
> > > > > > + UINT16 TenBitTagRequesterEnable : 1;
> > > > > > UINT16 Obff : 2;
> > > > > > UINT16 EndEndTlpPrefixBlocking : 1;
> > > > > > } Bits;
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.21.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-22 6:26 [PATCH] MdePkg/PciExpress21.h: Fix the PCIe industry standard registers Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 14:04 ` Liming Gao
2019-07-25 14:24 ` Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 14:35 ` Liming Gao
2019-07-25 15:29 ` Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 15:35 ` Liming Gao
2019-07-25 16:04 ` Javeed, Ashraf [this message]
2019-07-25 16:22 ` Liming Gao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-25 17:57 Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 18:16 Javeed, Ashraf
2019-07-25 18:23 Javeed, Ashraf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95C5C2B113DE604FB208120C742E9824578BEAC8@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox