From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.20919.1680085210411692016 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 03:20:10 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="signature has expired" header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=fm3 header.b=FDlLOV6R; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 66.111.4.26, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF0B5C0130; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:20:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:20:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdio.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1680085209; x=1680171609; bh=ZoiAYt/brpFEEaCl/a2LhF7C/Z5aymxs1w5 RbYLwaP4=; b=FDlLOV6RmBxe3mw51uInlNUrPbLUmVQt+TxBlOj/xk/hBe1tMrY TFPpFW9WP7XqbkH2JG33JII1ljysFuyZ7SwnVBUyvEABhorr1cxXXmHFsv61nQT/ kmzqoRGOuLJmKwTzK/At5LAysojPpFshtENmljKR3knvlfmfZcxsktjU3iq18tdP uzzd9FV0QhamJWGuYkDTcKbvaiJroA8ZWrLX7xo8l67LGhn4N4VfFj3ecvVrVY3n 0faWpBhcTQ5eqPDw8Z0s7H7gz3OczkQx6F79oL0c7F0vCak+DlZaSipzmQd7UdF6 PjOGJ6QM8NAEo2iVM6F1AnpEX9FPDlS89YQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1680085209; x=1680171609; bh=ZoiAYt/brpFEEaCl/a2LhF7C/Z5aymxs1w5 RbYLwaP4=; b=kxzO6t5ptwEYUdF5/NwAZwdIH7lDVrurt6IecueP1GhHMAqBb5N ptZzvLQc7i+ds9NhyRGlkq6gBqKst02ayDqwKiFpKSIJPm7ulQCTTAjIQz7ZFmH8 j/Pbb1CboQ8RNgLHEWQ1ISGyIIzJPzVV/hvhG2TrJQi/pT6OhWZdrwTlbY4EYnEQ Fv1AsKHvAYDLeU3NUPv5pO8t1PkGjYOwIMQrG80x9QeO13Wc1h1T90+sWQT1zHu/ aJdkDHfgJTFQpMjGOA7w0xtdlQ4slw7XgYa6vFcETCpEZZgQ74E6M1kn8Lo/SoXF xWNktCzj9mOUbYqyekvyyiv0CmjR4RCHKcA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdehiedgvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvggs vggttggrucevrhgrnhcuoehrvggsvggttggrsegsshguihhordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeehleekgfdutedugeehgeffgffhteefhffhteetfeevhefgvdejhedthfff ieffleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hrvggsvggttggrsegsshguihhordgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i5b994698:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:20:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <974892f7-c3f7-e391-1b3b-1c725517e40f@bsdio.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 04:20:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] BaseTools,CryptoPkg,MdePkg,OvmfPkg: Delete CLANG35,CLANG38,GCC48,GCC49, rename GCC5 to GCC, update CLANGDWARF, delete VS 2008-2013, EBC To: Ard Biesheuvel , devel@edk2.groups.io, gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn Cc: Oliver Smith-Denny , Guomin Jiang , Xiaoyu Lu , Jian J Wang , Jiewen Yao , Ard Biesheuvel , Jordan Justen , Gerd Hoffmann , Bob Feng , Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm , Michael D Kinney References: <20230328173111.759017-1-rebecca@bsdio.com> <02fb01d961dc$88d6acd0$9a840670$@byosoft.com.cn> From: "Rebecca Cran" In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/29/23 1:39 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Could we perhaps do > > GCC49 -> GCC > GCC5 -> GCCLTO > > ? > > As with CLANG35/38, the GCCx names have become rather obsolete, so I'd > prefer to have a set of more generic names, and a sliding window of > supported versions that can be documented in tools_def.template (and > updated at times) We need a minimum of GCC 6 to run CI because UnitTestFrameworkPkg/Library/GoogleTestLib uses nullptr that GCC 5 doesn't support, so the GCC5 name is wrong anyway. -- Rebecca Cran