From: "Rebecca Cran" <rebecca@bsdio.com>
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io, pedro.falcato@gmail.com, "Kinney,
Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "POLUDOV, FELIX" <felixp@ami.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [edk2-rfc] RFC v2: Static Analysis in edk2 CI
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 16:59:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9afb0946-a585-18b9-0e8f-6faaaf1516bf@bsdio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKbZUD2xbi8Pf8NLB6u-ePZ2sAhUhsBbKELGa61U91==MYB2vg@mail.gmail.com>
LLVM's tools also appear to be much easier to review, for other people
to run etc. I'd suggest at least starting with clang-tidy + scan-build
and possibly adding Coverity later.
I've found the Coverity tools, while very powerful, tend to get ignored
after a while because it's quite a process to keep it running, go
through the issues it detects and keep the database up-to-date etc.
--
Rebecca Cran
On 6/13/22 15:54, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> (Replying under Mike for devel visibility)
>
> Felix,
>
> Why coverity? I feel like we could run something akin to LLVM's clang-tidy
> + scan-build; it's open source (transparent *and* we can improve it or add
> UEFI quirks) and doesn't rely on a third-party service. I'm sure we could
> figure something out for hosting the thing. Otherwise, looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 7:54 PM Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +devel@edk2.groups.io
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rfc@edk2.groups.io <rfc@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Felix
>> Polyudov via groups.io
>>> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 10:48 AM
>>> To: rfc@edk2.groups.io
>>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [edk2-rfc] RFC v2: Static Analysis in edk2 CI
>>>
>>> This is version 2 of the proposal that provides additional details
>> regarding the bring up process.
>>> The initial version is at https://edk2.groups.io/g/rfc/message/696
>>>
>>> The goal of the proposal is integration of the static analysis (SA) into
>> the edk2 workflow.
>>> - Use Open Coverity SA service to scan edk2 repository. The service is
>> free for open source projects.
>>> edk2 Open Coverity project:
>> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/tianocore-edk2
>>> - Update edk2 CI scripts to run analysis once a week
>>> - Perform analysis on all the edk2 packages using package DSC files
>> that are used for CI build tests
>>> (Coverity analysis is executed in the course of a specially
>> instrumented project build).
>>> - SA results are uploaded to scan.coverity.com. To access them one
>> would need to register on the site and request tianocore-
>>> edk2 project access. The site can be used to triage the reported issues.
>> Confirmed issues can be addressed using a standard edk2
>>> process (Bugzilla, mailing list).
>>> - During the initial bring up period, access to the SA results is
>> restricted to stewards, maintainers, and members of the
>>> TianoCore InfoSec group, who are encouraged to review reported issues
>> with the primary goal of identifying security-related
>>> issues. All such issues should be handled in accordance with the
>> following guidelines:
>> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Reporting-Security-Issues
>>> - The initial bring up period ends when embargo for all the identified
>> security issues ends or after 30 days if no security
>>> issues have been identified
>>> - Once brig up period is over, SA results access is open to everybody.
>>> - The package maintainers should monitor weekly scan results for a newly
>> reported issues and reach back to original patch
>>> submitters to resolve them. Package maintainers can revert the patch if
>> no action is taken by the submitter.
>>> -The information contained in this message may be confidential and
>> proprietary to American Megatrends (AMI). This communication
>>> is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is
>> addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this
>>> message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any
>> distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly
>>> prohibited. Please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail or by
>> telephone at 770-246-8600, and then delete or destroy all
>>> copies of the transmission.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-13 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BN0PR10MB49817DF57E4808C7B340A067DEAB9@BN0PR10MB4981.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
2022-06-13 18:54 ` RFC v2: Static Analysis in edk2 CI Michael D Kinney
2022-06-13 21:54 ` [edk2-rfc] " Pedro Falcato
2022-06-13 22:59 ` Rebecca Cran [this message]
[not found] ` <30179.1655232215857794558@groups.io>
[not found] ` <CAKbZUD3Pc+AEcOFjNjjjsV5KwBVVGochh9k4ufd1VpbF_xasjQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-06-14 20:00 ` Pedro Falcato
2022-06-24 1:29 ` Michael D Kinney
2022-06-27 17:07 ` Felix Polyudov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9afb0946-a585-18b9-0e8f-6faaaf1516bf@bsdio.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox