From: Daniil Egranov <daniil.egranov@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: Fixed PCI DMA Map/Umap bounce buffer
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:58:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c321c94-0db4-e72e-e2e8-8f21734fe721@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-0jUKOhcmL_5rwbn8UgYxH0n5-W7Mgx3Q5-y7jo5GTEg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ard,
Thanks for you comments. Please see my comments below.
On 10/10/2017 03:59 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 10 October 2017 at 04:41, Daniil Egranov <daniil.egranov@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ard, Ray,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>>
>> On 10/09/2017 07:23 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 9 October 2017 at 11:40, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 9 October 2017 at 08:42, Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> The "read"/"write" is from the Bus Master's point of view.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks/Ray
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>>> Daniil
>>>>>> Egranov
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:16 AM
>>>>>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>>>> Cc: leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>;
>>>>>> ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
>>>>>> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: Fixed PCI DMA
>>>>>> Map/Umap bounce buffer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patch corrects the logic of transferring data between a bounce
>>>>>> buffer and a
>>>>>> real buffer above 4GB:
>>>>>> 1. In the case of mapping a bounce buffer for the write operation, data
>>>>>> from a
>>>>>> real buffer should be copied into a bounce buffer.
>>>>>> 2.In the case of unmapping a bounce buffer for the read operation, data
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> be copied from a bounce buffer into a real buffer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patch resolves a Juno board issue with the the grub and SATA
>>>>>> drives.
>>>>>>
>>>> I am intrigued by this.
>>>>
>>>> So as I suggested, this has to do with 64-bit DMA, but not in the way
>>>> I suspected. UEFI itself never hits this code path, because it runs
>>>> entirely < 32 GB, but as soon as GRUB starts allocating loader data
>>>> and use it for DMA, the bounce buffering kicks in because apparently,
>>>> the SATA controller is not 64-bit DMA capable.
>>>>
>>>> Are you using the SataSiI3132Dxe driver on Juno? Does this help at all?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
>>>> b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
>>>> index 2fb5fd68db01..a938563ebdd6 100644
>>>> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
>>>> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
>>>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ SiI3132AtaPassThruCommand (
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Status = PciIo->Map (
>>>> - PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterRead,
>>>> + PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterWrite,
>>>> Packet->InDataBuffer, &InDataBufferLength,
>>>> &PhysInDataBuffer, &PciAllocMapping
>>>> );
>>>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ SiI3132AtaPassThruCommand (
>>>> OutDataBufferLength = Packet->OutTransferLength *
>>>> SataDevice->BlockSize;
>>>>
>>>> Status = PciIo->Map (
>>>> - PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterWrite,
>>>> + PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterRead,
>>>> Packet->OutDataBuffer, &OutDataBufferLength,
>>>> &PhysOutDataBuffer, &PciAllocMapping
>>>> );
>>>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> Also, it might make sense to find out if the hardware is really not
>>> 64-bit DMA capable, or whether the driver simply fails to set the
>>> EFI_PCI_IO_ATTRIBUTE_DUAL_ADDRESS_CYCLE attribute.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>> Swapping the EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterRead and
>> EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterWrite operations in the SiI3132AtaPassThru.c fixes
>> the problem as well. The driver's patch will be the correct fix for this
>> issue. I think i missed the point what these operations are from the Bus
>> Master's perspective.
>>
> Good!
>
>> The old PciHostBridge Juno driver was using NullDmaLib so it was direct
>> mapping. That explains why the SataSiI3132Dxe worked with the original host
>> bridge driver and failed with the new one.
>>
> NullDmaLib has nothing to do with this. The difference between the old
> driver and the generic one is that the old driver always enables
> 64-bit DMA, while the generic one only does so if the driver sets the
> EFI_PCI_IO_ATTRIBUTE_DUAL_ADDRESS_CYCLE attribute. So to fix this
> driver, we should
I meant what the NullDmaLib masked out this issue.
> a) fix the swapped constants above
> b) set EFI_PCI_IO_ATTRIBUTE_DUAL_ADDRESS_CYCLE in the Start() hook
The PCIe is a serial bus protocol and does not implement DAC. The
meaning of this attribute is understandable but the name is incorrect.
PCIe designed with native 64-bit addressing so in context of PCIe this
attribute is not valid ... and I doubt what any legacy PCI devices are
still exist/usable.
Anyway, I set this attribute in the patch. In Juno case, bounce buffer
is not used anymore.
> c) add code to disable DMA at ExitBootServices() [or the controller
> may scribble over RAM when the kernel takes over]
> d) replace mbStarted with a per-controller attribute, given that this
> is a UEFI driver model implementation that could theoretically drive
> multiple hardware instances concurrently.
I sent a set of patches with all changes. Please take a look.
Thanks,
Daniil
> Thanks,
> Ard.
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 1:15 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: Fixed PCI DMA Map/Umap bounce buffer Daniil Egranov
2017-10-09 7:42 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-10-09 10:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-09 12:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-10 3:41 ` Daniil Egranov
2017-10-10 8:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-27 5:58 ` Daniil Egranov [this message]
2017-10-27 7:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c321c94-0db4-e72e-e2e8-8f21734fe721@arm.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox