public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rebecca Cran" <rebecca@bsdio.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] GitHub PR Code Review process now active
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:08:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dc7002a-350a-4b72-a655-5aba1768d6d7@bsdio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB49293DBC071BF0114592A61FD2F92@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Mike,


I was wondering if you think we're ready to switch over to PRs on the 
other repos yet?


I'm pushing for this because I have a set of changes waiting to go in 
but we've decided to

wait until we can use the easier PR process.


Should we discuss it in tomorrow's (Monday) Tools call?


-- 
Rebecca Cran


On 6/5/24 5:27 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> The Merge button may not work in that case either if there is
> parallel activity by other developers or Mergify.  Using the
> "push" label is recommended so Maintainers do not have to wait
> and rebase.
>
> I understand the desire to apply to other repos quickly.  Let's
> work through some of these known issues for another week and
> then evaluate if it should be applied to edk2-platforms yet.
>
> Mike
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@os.amperecomputing.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2024 3:48 PM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] GitHub PR Code Review process now active
>>
>> On 6/5/2024 4:21 PM, Michael D Kinney via groups.io wrote:
>>> * Some PRs have been merged using the "Rebase and Merge" button in the
>>>     PR after all required reviews completed and all CI checks pass. Instead,
>>>     the "push" label should continue to be used. There does not appear to be
>>>     any unexpected side effects from the "Rebase and Merge" button, but that
>>>     option is not available if the PR needs to be rebased. This is what
>>>     Mergify handles through a merge queue, so the easiest way to merge right
>>>     now is the "push" label.
>>>
>>>     If the most recent commit was not performed by an EDK II Maintainers,
>> then
>>>     Mergify attempt to rebase may fail.
>>>
>>>       Mitigation #1: EDK II Maintainer perform a rebase
>>>       Mitigation #2: Update Mergify to use a bot account with write
>> permission
>>>                      to perform rebase operations.
>>>
>>>     There was feedback earlier in the year that the git commit history does
>>>     not indicate which maintainer was the committer.  Instead it always
>> shows
>>>     Mergify.
>>>
>>>     The use of GitHub Merge Queues will be evaluated to see if it can be
>> used
>>>     instead of Mergify and remove the need for the "push" label and allow
>> the
>>>     "Rebase and Merge" button to be used and avoid the Mergify permission
>> issues.
>>
>> So it sounds like using the "Merge" button is fine as long as the user
>> understands they may need to rebase, wait for CI to finish and then merge?
>>
>> Also, is there a timeline on enabling PRs for the other repos? I'd
>> really like to switch to them for edk2-platforms, even if it means
>> having to update settings in multiple repos as we find issues with the
>> process.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rebecca Cran
>
>
> 
>
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119590): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119590
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106355103/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-16 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-28 18:53 [edk2-devel] GitHub PR Code Review process now active Michael D Kinney
2024-05-29  6:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-05-29 15:00   ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-29 16:38     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-05-29 18:09       ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-29 18:18         ` Rebecca Cran
2024-05-29 18:27           ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-29 19:25             ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-29 20:06               ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-30  0:51                 ` Michael Kubacki
2024-05-30 17:38                   ` Saloni Kasbekar
2024-05-30 18:00                     ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-31  3:50                       ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-31  4:36                         ` Michael Kubacki
2024-06-21  5:15                       ` Dhaval Sharma
2024-06-21  5:25                         ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-30  8:32                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2024-05-30 14:10                   ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-29 10:40 ` Chang, Abner via groups.io
2024-05-29 14:44   ` Michael D Kinney
2024-05-29 14:48     ` Chang, Abner via groups.io
2024-05-30  0:41       ` Yao, Jiewen
2024-06-03 16:13 ` Neal Gompa
2024-06-03 16:26   ` Michael D Kinney
2024-06-03 18:46     ` Neal Gompa
2024-06-03 19:38       ` Michael D Kinney
2024-06-05 22:21         ` Michael D Kinney
2024-06-05 22:47           ` Rebecca Cran via groups.io
2024-06-05 23:27             ` Michael D Kinney
2024-06-16 22:08               ` Rebecca Cran [this message]
2024-06-06  1:21           ` Guo Dong
2024-06-06  1:37             ` Michael D Kinney
2024-06-04 13:23       ` Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9dc7002a-350a-4b72-a655-5aba1768d6d7@bsdio.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox