public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, daniel.schaefer@hpe.com
Cc: derek.lin2@hpe.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Multithreaded compression with LZMA2
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:24:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ebc277a-4acd-f567-cc08-fa076e4a5766@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a87105e7-be55-b66d-eee0-a9f495f705e8@hpe.com>

On 12/02/20 03:59, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'm looking into how to speed up the build process and noticed that our
> build
> uses LZMA to encrypt the main firmware volume. Since it's quite big it
> takes a
> while but only uses one CPU thread.
> 
> LZMA2 is a version of LZMA which can be multi-threaded and achieve much
> faster
> compression times. I did a quick benchmark using the `xz` command-line
> tool,
> which uses a modified version of the LZMA SDK that EDK2 uses. The
> results are:
> 
> Uncompressed size: 64M
> 
> | Algo  | Comp Time | Decomp Time | Size | Threads |
> | ----- | --------- | ----------- | ---- | ------- |
> | LZMA  |    19.67s |        0.9s | 9.1M |       1 |
> | LZMA2 |    20.11s |        1.2s | 9.2M |       1 |
> | LZMA2 |     8.31s |        1.0s | 9.4M |       4 |
> 
> Using those commands:
> 
> time xz --format=lzma testfile
> time unlzma testfile.lzma
> 
> time xz --lzma2 testfile
> time unxz testfile.xz
> 
> time xz -T4 --lzma2 testfile
> time unxz testfile.xz
> 
> This is quite a significant improvement of build time, while
> decompression time
> and size only slightly increase. If that's a concern, then LZMA2 could
> be used
> for development only.
> 
> I haven't investigated the details of how to support this in the code
> but it
> appears to be a simple change, since the LZMA SDK that we use already
> supports
> LZMA2.
> 
> What do you think?

"xz -T" works by splitting the input into blocks, and it generates a
multi-block compressed output. I'm unsure if the current LZMA
decompressor that runs inside the firmware (= guided section extractor)
copes with multi-block input.

Thanks
Laszlo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-02  2:59 Multithreaded compression with LZMA2 Daniel Schaefer
2020-12-02  3:36 ` [edk2-devel] " Andrew Fish
2020-12-02  5:21   ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-12-02  8:24     ` Daniel Schaefer
2020-12-03 10:24 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-12-03 12:11   ` Daniel Schaefer
2020-12-03 15:57     ` Bret Barkelew
2020-12-04  8:19       ` Daniel Schaefer
2020-12-03 23:35     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-12-04  2:28       ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-12-04  9:02         ` Daniel Schaefer
2020-12-08  6:01           ` 回复: " gaoliming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ebc277a-4acd-f567-cc08-fa076e4a5766@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox