From: Karunakar P <karunakarp@amiindia.co.in>
To: "'edk2-devel@lists.01.org'" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
"Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>,
"'Fu, Siyuan'" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Different ISCSI behavior when 2 attempts are added
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 14:51:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A885E3F3F1F22B44AF7CC779C062228EE068A03E@VENUS1.in.megatrends.com> (raw)
Hello All,
Found the below behavior when I try for ISCSI connection with 2 Valid attempts.
Case 1:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP4----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt1(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt2 tried but session does not exist
Case 2:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP4----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt2(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt1 tried but session does not exist
Case 3:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---Autoconfigure --->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt1(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt2 tried but session does not exist
Case 4:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6--->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---Autoconfigure ----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt2(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt1 tried but session does not exist
1. Case1 & Case3 looks fine as 1st valid attempt connected
2. But Case2 & Case4 looks bit different, 1St attempt was valid but connection success with 2nd attempt
3. As we found that IScsiIp4 Driver Binding Start is getting call first and processing the IP4 attempt first even though it is 2nd attempt
Could you please comment on this whether this is a bug or Not?
Thanks,
Karunakar
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 14:51 Karunakar P [this message]
2017-10-10 3:00 ` Different ISCSI behavior when 2 attempts are added Wu, Jiaxin
2017-10-10 3:08 ` Ye, Ting
2017-10-10 3:26 ` Karunakar P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A885E3F3F1F22B44AF7CC779C062228EE068A03E@VENUS1.in.megatrends.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox