From: "Marvin Häuser" <Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com>
To: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Depend on PCD values of the page tables.
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 13:34:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM5PR0601MB257943C2945087C5235682FB80A20@AM5PR0601MB2579.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92036971-fcd8-487c-552b-0750d648cfe3@redhat.com>
Hey Laszlo,
I'm terribly sorry for the mistakes in v3, I made it in a hurry because it was late - should have postponded for today.
Because I didn't see 'your v3' (or didn't you post it yet?), I posted a v4 as you said, which should have fixed the three comments you had.
Thank you very much for your input!
Regards,
Marvin.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 12:56 AM
> To: Marvin Häuser <Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
> Cc: jordan.l.justen@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Depend on PCD values of the
> page tables.
>
> Three comments:
>
> On 11/03/16 22:41, Marvin Häuser wrote:
> > Currently, the value of the page tables' address is hard-coded in the
> > ResetVector. This patch replaces these values with a PCD dependency.
> >
> > A check for the size has been added to alert the developer to rewrite
> > the ASM according to the new size, if it has been changed.
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Haeuser <Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com>
> > ---
> > OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm | 23 ++++++++++----------
> > OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf | 5 +++++
> > OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb | 6 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm
> > b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm
> > index b5a4cf8d7187..0b95a7fa9a86 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm
> > @@ -44,10 +44,11 @@ BITS 32
> > SetCr3ForPageTables64:
> >
> > ;
> > - ; For OVMF, build some initial page tables at 0x800000-0x806000.
> > + ; For OVMF, build some initial page tables at
> > + ; PcdOvmfSecPageTablesBase - (PcdOvmfSecPageTablesBase + 0x6000).
> > ;
> > - ; This range should match with PcdOvmfSecPageTablesBase and
> > - ; PcdOvmfSecPageTablesSize which are declared in the FDF files.
> > + ; This range should match with PcdOvmfSecPageTablesSize which is
> > + ; declared in the FDF files.
> > ;
> > ; At the end of PEI, the pages tables will be rebuilt into a
> > ; more permanent location by DxeIpl.
> > @@ -56,21 +57,21 @@ SetCr3ForPageTables64:
> > mov ecx, 6 * 0x1000 / 4
> > xor eax, eax
> > clearPageTablesMemoryLoop:
> > - mov dword[ecx * 4 + 0x800000 - 4], eax
> > + mov dword[ecx * 4 + PT_ADDR (0 - 4)], eax
>
> I think this is incorrect (or dubious at least); the NASM-level replacement text
> for this will be
>
> (0x800000 + (0 - 4))
>
> and I strongly dislike the (0 - 4) subexpression. The type in which NASM
> evaluates (0 - 4) is not specified, and I'd rather not risk it being UINT64, for
> example.
>
> > loop clearPageTablesMemoryLoop
> >
> > ;
> > ; Top level Page Directory Pointers (1 * 512GB entry)
> > ;
> > - mov dword[0x800000], 0x801000 + PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > + mov dword[PT_ADDR (0)], PT_ADDR (0x1000) + PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> >
> > ;
> > ; Next level Page Directory Pointers (4 * 1GB entries => 4GB)
> > ;
> > - mov dword[0x801000], 0x802000 + PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > - mov dword[0x801008], 0x803000 + PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > - mov dword[0x801010], 0x804000 + PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > - mov dword[0x801018], 0x805000 + PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > + mov dword[PT_ADDR (0x1000)], PT_ADDR (0x2000) +
> PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > + mov dword[PT_ADDR (0x1008)], PT_ADDR (0x3000) +
> PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > + mov dword[PT_ADDR (0x1010)], PT_ADDR (0x4000) +
> PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> > + mov dword[PT_ADDR (0x1018)], PT_ADDR (0x5000) +
> PAGE_PDP_ATTR
> >
> > ;
> > ; Page Table Entries (2048 * 2MB entries => 4GB) @@ -81,13 +82,13
> > @@ pageTableEntriesLoop:
> > dec eax
> > shl eax, 21
> > add eax, PAGE_2M_PDE_ATTR
> > - mov [ecx * 8 + 0x802000 - 8], eax
> > + mov [ecx * 8 + PT_ADDR (0x2000 - 8)], eax
> > loop pageTableEntriesLoop
> >
> > ;
> > ; Set CR3 now that the paging structures are available
> > ;
> > - mov eax, 0x800000
> > + mov eax, PT_ADDR (0)
> > mov cr3, eax
> >
> > OneTimeCallRet SetCr3ForPageTables64 diff --git
> > a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf
> > b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf
> > index 46610d243ecf..d1e5d4d9bdea 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf
> > @@ -29,9 +29,14 @@ [Sources]
> > ResetVector.nasmb
> >
> > [Packages]
> > + OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec
> > MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
> > UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dec
> >
> > [BuildOptions]
> > *_*_IA32_NASMB_FLAGS = -
> I$(WORKSPACE)/UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/
> > *_*_X64_NASMB_FLAGS = -
> I$(WORKSPACE)/UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/Vtf0/
> > +
> > +[Pcd]
> > + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecPageTablesBase
> > + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecPageTablesSize
> > diff --git a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb
> > b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb
> > index 31ac06ae4a8c..4bf8c97d8158 100644
> > --- a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb
> > +++ b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb
> > @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@
> > %include "Ia32/SearchForSecEntry.asm"
> >
> > %ifdef ARCH_X64
> > + %if (FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfSecPageTablesSize) != 0x6000)
> > + %error "This implementation inherently depends on
> PcdOvmfSecPageTablesSize"
> > + %endif
> > +
> > + #include <AutoGen.h>
>
> I think this order is wrong. The C preprocessor won't fully expand
> FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfSecPageTablesSize) I believe, because AutoGen.h
> is included after the use of the macro. In turn NASM won't find a plain
> numeric constant on the LHS of the inequality.
>
> > + %define PT_ADDR(Offset) FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfSecPageTablesBase)
>
> This misses the Offset macro param in the replacement text.
>
> > %include "Ia32/Flat32ToFlat64.asm"
> > %include "Ia32/PageTables64.asm"
> > %endif
> >
>
> Marvin, please send a v4, or else please respond with your R-b to "my"
> v3 (and then we can commit that series, if Jordan agrees) -- either works for
> me.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-03 21:41 [PATCH v3] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Depend on PCD values of the page tables Marvin Häuser
2016-11-03 23:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-04 13:34 ` Marvin Häuser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM5PR0601MB257943C2945087C5235682FB80A20@AM5PR0601MB2579.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox