From: Udit Kumar <udit.kumar@nxp.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@nxp.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI table HID/CID allocation
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 12:56:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM6PR0402MB33349C441632A666EB8E06CC91270@AM6PR0402MB3334.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2166aaa7-2f96-50d4-4502-bbb9b8b9ef22@linaro.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Thompson [mailto:daniel.thompson@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:42 AM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Udit Kumar <udit.kumar@nxp.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Varun Sethi
> <V.Sethi@nxp.com>; Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI table HID/CID allocation
>
> >
> > PRP0001 + compatible was invented to avoid the need to allocate a _HID
> > for each and every component in existence that can already be
> > identified by a DT compatible string (and little else except, e.g., a
> > I2C slave address) and is not deeply engrained in the SoC in terms of
> > clock tree, power states etc. So while internal/external may not be
> > the most accurate distinction, it is still a useful one IMHO.
>
> Hmnnn.... it sounds like jedec,spi-nor meets this test.
>
> There is only one property in the DT bindings that describes the device
> itself (fast read support) rather than its "bus address" (chip select,
> frequency). Further, that single property is obsolete, at least for
> Linux; the kernel driver now contains a quirks tables to look up by
> device ID whether fast read is supported and will use that on non-DT
> systems (and also to censor broken DT systems ;-) ).
You mean, this more on bus frame work, how to probe slave.
Example rtc-ds3232.c , when is spi mode just need name
but for i2c mode it needs of_match_table
Thanks
Udit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-25 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 9:19 [RFC] ACPI table HID/CID allocation Udit Kumar
2017-11-21 9:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-21 9:59 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-21 10:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-21 11:32 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-21 12:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-21 13:24 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-21 14:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-21 18:10 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-22 11:30 ` Daniel Thompson
2017-11-22 13:39 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-22 17:34 ` Andrew Fish
2017-11-25 12:40 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-22 19:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-22 20:11 ` Daniel Thompson
2017-11-25 12:56 ` Udit Kumar [this message]
2017-11-25 19:41 ` Andrew Fish
2017-11-26 8:35 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-27 12:13 ` Daniel Thompson
2017-11-27 13:31 ` Udit Kumar
2017-11-25 12:47 ` Udit Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM6PR0402MB33349C441632A666EB8E06CC91270@AM6PR0402MB3334.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox