public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cohen, Eugene" <eugene@hp.com>
To: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: IP4 Config Troubles with DHCP
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:10:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AT5PR84MB0291C783DF0E7E53AABE9B6CB4120@AT5PR84MB0291.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B7274137C5EF1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Jiaxin,
 
> Actually, you don't need to retry the UDP configuration loop according
> the Ip4Mode.IsConfigured flag. You are only recommended to set a
> timer to check the mapping status after the configuration:
> 
> For example:
>   Status = Nlc->Udp4->Configure(Nlc->Udp4, &Nlc->UdpConfig);
>   if (EFI_ERROR (Status) && (Status != EFI_NO_MAPPING)) {
>       return  Status;
>   }
>   if (Status == EFI_NO_MAPPING && !UdpGetMapping (Nlc->Udp4)) {
>       return  Status;
>   }
> 
> In UdpGetMapping () function, create one timer to check
> Ip4Mode.IsConfigured:
> 
> For example:
> UdpGetMapping () {
>   IsMapDone = FALSE;
>   gBS->CreateEvent (EVT_TIMER, TPL_CALLBACK, NULL, NULL,
> &TimeoutEvent);
>   gBS->SetTimer (TimeoutEvent, TimerRelative, AnyValue);
>   while (EFI_ERROR (gBS->CheckEvent (TimeoutEvent))) {
>     Udp4->Poll (Udp4);
>     Udp4->GetModeData (Udp4, &Udp4Mode, & Ip4Mode, NULL,
> NULL);
>     if (Ip4Mode.IsConfigured) {
>       IsMapDone = TRUE;
>       break;
>     }
>   }
>   return IsMapDone;
> }
> 
> If DHCP process succeed, Ip4Mode.IsConfigured should be updated. If
> not, any bug may be existed.

In testing the new patch (removing RECONFIG=TRUE) I see that the statement you made above is not accurate when the protocol is TCP.  When Configure is called the first time it returns EFI_NO_MAPPING.  This seems to be remembered in the socket state: ((Sock)->ConfigureState == SO_NO_MAPPING) so that any attempt to use the instance after Ip4Mode.IsConfigured goes TRUE fails (like for a TCP4 Listen).

So for TCP we must issue another Configure request to clean up this state so it's not as simple as just polling the GetModeData result, at least for TCP.

Do you believe this is expected behavior?

Thanks,

Eugene




  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-15 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-10 18:13 IP4 Config Troubles with DHCP Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-11  6:57 ` FW: " Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-11 14:31   ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-12  0:19     ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-12  8:27     ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-12 12:34       ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-08-13  7:51         ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-15 14:10   ` Cohen, Eugene [this message]
2016-08-16  1:27     ` Wu, Jiaxin
2016-08-16 19:44       ` Cohen, Eugene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AT5PR84MB0291C783DF0E7E53AABE9B6CB4120@AT5PR84MB0291.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox