From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.24; helo=mga09.intel.com; envelope-from=siyuan.fu@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A71821A07A80 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:42:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Sep 2018 01:42:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,305,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="91993840" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2018 01:39:12 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:39:13 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:39:12 -0700 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.245]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.183]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:39:10 +0800 From: "Fu, Siyuan" To: Sivaraman Nainar , "Ye, Ting" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Thread-Topic: reg: Clarification on PXE Boot with Client and Server in Different Sub nets Thread-Index: AdRVcKWiU0I9fFF4R4mi4TQWH2H4owAA1e/w Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:39:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYjZjNmJjMmQtZGU2Mi00NWViLWI3NzgtNWYyNjkwYWIxNGQ1IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiNmozNVBNdXc3RzRPbFYwcE5HcnNrMm8zMjRXbFRIbGlUdlwvVFc4dFwvVVhjKzZDNXNqV3lBUWhJbkZMVmlGMThxIn0= dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: reg: Clarification on PXE Boot with Client and Server in Different Sub nets X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:42:26 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Siva I think PXE boot should work if the relay agent is configured correctly to = forward DHCP packets to our client, with the proper gateway address. Are yo= u encounter any problem with such use case? BestRegards Fu Siyuan > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of > Sivaraman Nainar > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:21 PM > To: Ye, Ting ; Fu, Siyuan ; edk2- > devel@lists.01.org > Subject: [edk2] reg: Clarification on PXE Boot with Client and Server in > Different Sub nets >=20 > Hello, >=20 > Can you clarify if PXE boot supported to work with Client and PXE / DHCP > Server running in different subnet? >=20 > When the DHCP server running with Relay agent to manage different subnets > will PXE boot work? >=20 > -Siva > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel