From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: intel.com, ip: 134.134.136.31, mailfrom: siyuan.fu@intel.com) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by groups.io with SMTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:52:30 -0700 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2019 23:52:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,388,1549958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="340265959" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2019 23:52:29 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx122.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.37) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:52:28 -0700 Received: from shsmsx154.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.54) by fmsmsx122.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:52:28 -0700 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.93]) by SHSMSX154.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:52:26 +0800 From: "Siyuan, Fu" To: "Gao, Liming" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" CC: "Wu, Jiaxin" Subject: Re: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe Thread-Topic: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe Thread-Index: AdTwUWKmLceMF3sQRL6RsCNXowrmRwAA/XKgAh85JOAABs+wQABdLJrgAAH93gA= Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 06:52:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <15946547E484F802.30727@groups.io> <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E42BEDB@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E42FBE6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E42FBE6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYmYzYTVkZDctMDQxNy00NTQ3LTliNDgtODMxZmRhYmY4MTUxIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoidFwvemF0bGtcL3FrSDRPdVVsWkJqNEdsdHF3S0Vqd0ZcL2puTzVtOHNDaFBaUW42K3hjWEJnNDNFcnhhNnQweXZ0eSJ9 dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.600.7 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: siyuan.fu@intel.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B1FF2E9001CE9041BD10B825821D5BC58B730B8BSHSMSX103ccrcor_" --_000_B1FF2E9001CE9041BD10B825821D5BC58B730B8BSHSMSX103ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Liming Yes, Wang Fan already sent out the patch to remove both IpSecDxe and the I= psecConfig application. See the patch https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/39389?p=3D,,,20,0,0,0::relevance,,R= emove+IpSec+driver+and+application,20,2,0,31305481 BestRegards Fu Siyuan From: Gao, Liming Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 1:56 PM To: Fu, Siyuan ; devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Wu, Jiaxin Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe Siyuan: Another question here. Can NetworkPkg\Application\IpsecConfig be also re= moved? If Ipsec driver is removed, IpsecConfig application is not required. Thanks Liming From: Fu, Siyuan Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 5:27 PM To: Gao, Liming >; devel= @edk2.groups.io Cc: Wu, Jiaxin > Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe Yes, Please. BestRegards Fu Siyuan From: Gao, Liming Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 2:13 PM To: Fu, Siyuan >; devel@ed= k2.groups.io Cc: Wu, Jiaxin > Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe Siyuan: Is this change for edk2 Q2 stable tag? If yes, I will add it into edk2 h= ttps://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Plannin= g. Thanks Liming From: Fu, Siyuan Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 6:58 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Fu, Siyuan > Cc: Wu, Jiaxin >; Gao, Lim= ing > Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe Bugzilla created for this https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id= =3D1697 BestRegards Fu Siyuan From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2= .groups.io] On Behalf Of Siyuan, Fu Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 6:39 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Wu, Jiaxin >; Gao, Lim= ing > Subject: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe All, You might notice that some activities about reducing edk2 repo happened or= are happening. I propose to remove the IpSecDxe driver from NetworkPkg. Anyone who wants = to use IpSecDxe can fetch it from stable tag https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/releases/tag/edk2-stable201903 If you have any concern regarding this, please let me know before 4/20/201= 9. Thanks, Siyuan --_000_B1FF2E9001CE9041BD10B825821D5BC58B730B8BSHSMSX103ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, Liming

 

Yes, Wang Fan already= sent out the patch to remove both IpSecDxe and the IpsecConfig application. See the patc= h

https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/39389?p= =3D,,,20,0,0,0::relevance,,Remove+IpSec+driver+and+applica= tion,20,2,0,31305481

 

 

BestRegards

Fu Siyuan<= /span>

 

From: Ga= o, Liming
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 1:56 PM
To: Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe

 

Siyuan:

  Another questi= on here. Can NetworkPkg\Application\IpsecConfig be also removed? If Ipsec d= river is removed, IpsecConfig application is not required.

 

Thanks

Liming

From: Fu, Siyuan
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 5:27 PM
To: Gao, Liming <liming.= gao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu= @intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe

 

Yes, Please.

 

BestRegards

Fu Siyuan<= /span>

 

From: Gao, Liming
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 2:13 PM
To: Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu= @intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu= @intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe

 

Siyuan:

  Is this change= for edk2 Q2 stable tag? If yes, I will add it into edk2 https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Plann= ing.

 

Thanks

Liming

From: Fu, Siyuan
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 6:58 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.co= m>
Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu= @intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe

 

Bugzilla created for = this https://= bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1697

 

BestRegards

Fu Siyuan<= /span>

 

From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:= devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Siyuan, Fu
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 6:39 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu= @intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Propose to remove IpSecDxe

 

All,

 

You might notice that some activities about reducin= g edk2 repo happened or are happening.

 

I propose to remove the IpSecDxe driver from Networ= kPkg. Anyone who wants to use IpSecDxe can fetch it from stable tag
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/releases/tag/edk2-stable201903

 

If you have any concern regarding this, please let = me know before 4/20/2019.

 

Thanks,

Siyuan

--_000_B1FF2E9001CE9041BD10B825821D5BC58B730B8BSHSMSX103ccrcor_--