From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=203.199.198.232; helo=imsva.in.megatrends.com; envelope-from=sivaramann@amiindia.co.in; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from IMSVA.IN.MEGATRENDS.COM (Webmail.amiindia.co.in [203.199.198.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A6921106FAB for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from IMSVA.IN.MEGATRENDS.COM (IMSVA.IN.MEGATRENDS.COM [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5389B82058 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:33:33 +0530 (IST) Received: from IMSVA.IN.MEGATRENDS.COM (IMSVA.IN.MEGATRENDS.COM [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475C182055 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:33:32 +0530 (IST) Received: from webmail.amiindia.co.in (venus1.in.megatrends.com [10.0.0.5]) by IMSVA.IN.MEGATRENDS.COM (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:33:32 +0530 (IST) Received: from VENUS2.in.megatrends.com ([fe80::2002:4a07:4f17:c09b]) by VENUS1.in.megatrends.com ([fe80::951:7975:6ecf:eae5%14]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:28:54 +0530 From: Sivaraman Nainar To: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Thread-Topic: reg: Clarification required on ISCSI Initiator Implementation Thread-Index: AdRAJkR8h6laenPYTCaeamfT6rFnWw== Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:58:53 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.0.84.81] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.1817-8.2.0.1013-24062.005 X-TM-AS-Result: No--17.971-5.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--17.971-5.0-31-10 X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.1817-8.2.1013-24062.005 X-TMASE-Result: 10--17.971100-10.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Df8pKFOOplIwfXl56Qt5SIGLeiqu1yTKFgk0ZPECSsEY0A95tjAn+3Hy Dp4fu+gqCuMeNI8ov5dJpV9rHFX3jwK3yA1Y0A1+wbRQ2Bpmlioay+BQxgCfhZb7No0srrTk7KB BZ2QBUyzQ23n+P5pIMRQjizXtCXfTWYqLLUX2mAtB6yOrxc8xu3cF/0kiqyh4RtqpRW8sWyLaz3 ayHTONm9l9DHcHloy4klPOPDP4bOiuEAHkLyBnqjTR2TFg0xG31ViV5EWK7TubKItl61J/yZUdX E/WGn0FiO264ITC5NiJoeB6BijRISq2rl3dzGQ1KfRcVSfMvAKRt+z2xQ14t0xKcM4WDPbIeQpk S94iIFj+XNMvaO/l3Q== X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: reg: Clarification required on ISCSI Initiator Implementation X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:58:59 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, As per the current ISCSI implementation there is only one Initiator name ma= intained even when there are multiple MAC and attempts are made from an UEF= I system. Is there history behind not allowing to change the Initiator Name specific = to MAC ? Thanks Siva