From: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build AppPkg with XCODE5
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:50:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B5D175C1-444F-49E4-BB02-8515309D7BC2@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D76E739@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Liming,
Your right I'm off by one. The signature is in the thing EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY points to.
I do have a question. Why does the PE/COFF code have an extra step. The TE images are converted PE/COFF images so would not you need this code in both places? Is there some other assumption in play here?
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c#L769
//
// From PeCoff spec, when DebugEntry.RVA == 0 means this debug info will not load into memory.
// Here we will always load EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW type debug info. so need adjust the
// ImageContext->ImageSize when DebugEntry.RVA == 0.
//
if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32) (DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);
if (DebugEntry.RVA == 0 && DebugEntry.FileOffset != 0) {
ImageContext->ImageSize += DebugEntry.SizeOfData;
}
return RETURN_SUCCESS;
}
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c#L862
if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32) (DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);
return RETURN_SUCCESS;
}
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:49 PM, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew:
> I get your point. I agree edk2 firmware to support old EFI image. And, I review the change in BasePeCoffLib. But, I think it is unnecessary. Below is the current logic. On the first loop, DebugEntry.Type is EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW, then will return. It doesn't enter into second loop. For mtoc debug entry, its DebugEntry.Type is also EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW, its DEBUG_CODEVIEW_ ENTRY Signature is CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC. So, it will be handled in this logic.
>
> for (Index = 0; Index < DebugDirectoryEntry->Size; Index += sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY)) {
> //
> // Read next debug directory entry
> //
> Size = sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY);
> ...
>
> //
> // From PeCoff spec, when DebugEntry.RVA == 0 means this debug info will not load into memory.
> // Here we will always load EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW type debug info. so need adjust the
> // ImageContext->ImageSize when DebugEntry.RVA == 0.
> //
> if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
> ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32) (DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);
> if (DebugEntry.RVA == 0 && DebugEntry.FileOffset != 0) {
> ImageContext->ImageSize += DebugEntry.SizeOfData;
> }
>
> return RETURN_SUCCESS;
> }
> }
>
> Thanks
> Liming
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: afish@apple.com [mailto:afish@apple.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 1:08 PM
>> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; edk2-
>> devel@lists.01.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build
>> AppPkg with XCODE5
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew:
>>> Edk2 Build system calls GenFw to generate EFI image in build phase. Even if
>> this image is not built into BIOS image, its EFI image will be generated by
>> GenFw. So, only if this EFI image is built from EDK2 project, it can be updated
>> by GenFw tool. You can see this step in build_rule.txt to convert .dll to .efi
>> image.
>>>
>>
>> Gao,
>>
>> We can fix the future for edk2, but we can't change the past, or change other
>> build systems. It is not safe to assume that every EFI executable that the DXE
>> Core will see is as new as the firmware, or was even built via the edk2. Option
>> ROMs and OS loaders are good examples of this issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrew Fish
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Liming
>>> From: afish@apple.com [mailto:afish@apple.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 12:59 AM
>>> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Zhu, Yonghong <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build
>> AppPkg with XCODE5
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 3:38 AM, Gao, Liming
>> <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew:
>>> If this is a mtoc bug, I suggest to update GenFw to always correct it in the
>> generated EFI image. If so, the EFI image is always correct. There is no change
>> requirement in PeCoff library in MdePkg.
>>>
>>>
>>> Liming,
>>>
>>> EFI supports loading PE/COFF images that are not built at the same time as
>> the platform firmware (UEFI Shell, OS loader), and that is why I added the fix
>> to the PE/COFF library code.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andrew Fish
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Liming
>>> From: afish@apple.com<mailto:afish@apple.com> [mailto:afish@apple.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 12:26 AM
>>> To: Zhu, Yonghong
>> <yonghong.zhu@intel.com<mailto:yonghong.zhu@intel.com>>
>>> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Gao, Liming
>> <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D
>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build
>> AppPkg with XCODE5
>>>
>>> Should that be:
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>>
>>> I also noticed the PeCoff lib is going to loop and reload the .debug suction
>> due to this mtoc bug, so it would be good to harden that code too.
>>>
>>> git diff MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
>> b/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
>>> index 8d1daba..1e4c67e 100644
>>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/BasePeCoffLib/BasePeCoff.c
>>> @@ -771,6 +771,8 @@ PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo (
>>> }
>>>
>>> return RETURN_SUCCESS;
>>> + } else if (DebugEntry.Type == CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC) {
>>> + return RETURN_SUCCESS;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> @@ -862,6 +864,8 @@ PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo (
>>> if (DebugEntry.Type == EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_CODEVIEW) {
>>> ImageContext->DebugDirectoryEntryRva = (UINT32)
>> (DebugDirectoryEntryRva + Index);
>>> return RETURN_SUCCESS;
>>> + } else if (DebugEntry.Type == CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC) {
>>> + return RETURN_SUCCESS;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andrew Fish
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2017, at 9:00 PM, Yonghong Zhu
>> <yonghong.zhu@intel.com<mailto:yonghong.zhu@intel.com><mailto:yongho
>> ng.zhu@intel.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> it is a bug in mtoc setting the size of the debug directory entry to
>>> the size of the .debug section, not the size of the
>>> EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY. It was causing a loop to iterate and
>>> get bogus EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY data and pass that to
>>> memset() and boom.
>>>
>>> Cc: Liming Gao
>> <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com><mailto:liming.gao@int
>> el.com>>
>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney
>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com><mailto:m
>> ichael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Fish
>> <afish@apple.com<mailto:afish@apple.com><mailto:afish@apple.com>>
>>> ---
>>> BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
>> b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
>>> index 246deb0..af60c92 100644
>>> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
>>> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/GenFw.c
>>> @@ -2813,10 +2813,11 @@ Returns:
>>> //
>>> // Get Debug, Export and Resource EntryTable RVA address.
>>> // Resource Directory entry need to review.
>>> //
>>> Optional32Hdr = (EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32 *) ((UINT8*) FileHdr +
>> sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_FILE_HEADER));
>>> + Optional64Hdr = (EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER64 *) ((UINT8*) FileHdr
>> + sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_FILE_HEADER));
>>> if (Optional32Hdr->Magic == EFI_IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR32_MAGIC) {
>>> SectionHeader = (EFI_IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER *) ((UINT8 *)
>> Optional32Hdr + FileHdr->SizeOfOptionalHeader);
>>> if (Optional32Hdr->NumberOfRvaAndSizes >
>> EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT && \
>>> Optional32Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].Size != 0) {
>>> ExportDirectoryEntryRva = Optional32Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].VirtualAddress;
>>> @@ -2833,11 +2834,10 @@ Returns:
>>> Optional32Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = 0;
>>> Optional32Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].VirtualAddress = 0;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> - Optional64Hdr = (EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER64 *) ((UINT8*) FileHdr
>> + sizeof (EFI_IMAGE_FILE_HEADER));
>>> SectionHeader = (EFI_IMAGE_SECTION_HEADER *) ((UINT8 *)
>> Optional64Hdr + FileHdr->SizeOfOptionalHeader);
>>> if (Optional64Hdr->NumberOfRvaAndSizes >
>> EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT && \
>>> Optional64Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].Size != 0) {
>>> ExportDirectoryEntryRva = Optional64Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].VirtualAddress;
>>> }
>>> @@ -2907,10 +2907,20 @@ Returns:
>>> RsdsEntry->Unknown = 0;
>>> RsdsEntry->Unknown2 = 0;
>>> RsdsEntry->Unknown3 = 0;
>>> RsdsEntry->Unknown4 = 0;
>>> RsdsEntry->Unknown5 = 0;
>>> + } else if (RsdsEntry->Signature == CODEVIEW_SIGNATURE_MTOC) {
>>> + // MTOC sets DebugDirectoryEntrySize to size of the .debug section,
>> so fix it.
>>> + if (!ZeroDebugFlag) {
>>> + if (Optional32Hdr->Magic ==
>> EFI_IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR32_MAGIC) {
>>> + Optional32Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = sizeof
>> (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY);
>>> + } else {
>>> + Optional64Hdr-
>>> DataDirectory[EFI_IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_DEBUG].Size = sizeof
>> (EFI_IMAGE_DEBUG_DIRECTORY_ENTRY);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.6.1.windows.1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-11 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 4:00 [Patch] BaseTools: Fix Segmentation fault: 11 when build AppPkg with XCODE5 Yonghong Zhu
2017-08-07 16:26 ` Andrew Fish
2017-08-08 1:14 ` Zhu, Yonghong
2017-08-10 10:38 ` Gao, Liming
2017-08-10 16:59 ` Andrew Fish
2017-08-11 4:48 ` Gao, Liming
2017-08-11 5:07 ` Andrew Fish
2017-08-11 5:49 ` Gao, Liming
2017-08-11 16:50 ` Andrew Fish [this message]
2017-08-14 2:13 ` Gao, Liming
2017-08-14 7:10 ` Gao, Liming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B5D175C1-444F-49E4-BB02-8515309D7BC2@apple.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox