From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.8006.1678921019009825912
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2023 15:56:59 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@posteo.de header.s=2017 header.b=WNCZwYSW;
 spf=pass (domain: posteo.de, ip: 185.67.36.65, mailfrom: mhaeuser@posteo.de)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) 
	by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C4F240406
	for <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:56:56 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017;
	t=1678921017; bh=aOivQNdTEB56Ezox2VkFAx399b7DGMMTo6QENoQVROM=;
	h=From:Subject:Date:Cc:To:From;
	b=WNCZwYSWOQpolAojCpU0dW0sUZuOD3p5ncZS7zOt64G2b8J4Kgf8cmLVMmtHUx6no
	 mDIdK2f7KsCQxlEM2612EF8eN54hfx56o5ZW3jzs1JaQBl3MNpgqdDVbYe7NQ5fhCi
	 rx/XAXoP5Jvx9Nvej1ztHdiVqAu9OQK5SvwA+AHbAnbEc/ZtQs4CarnkF7gkqaq6Hk
	 ++o1VVrFrm4b+oUGmP47ZSHOF8kuKwc4b2EOgoi/9nRxoy57f16WMbYyGQ9jRkI/l3
	 BoFiG3YhNgZvIVrJ6hFuoXIjA3s/6MXs0I3nsjmdDSpaL0ji8lgZ10XKoIrIppojZC
	 v4gZJlx5Otj/w==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PcQkb6Lxjz9rxD;
	Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:56:55 +0100 (CET)
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydmluIEjDpHVzZXI=?= <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] BaseTools/Conf/tools_def: Fix linking using CLANGDWARF_IA32_X64
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 22:56:54 +0000
Message-Id: <B6B28420-993D-456C-9FA6-A726C0828127@posteo.de>
References: <CAMj1kXECwHrEM_RQ3AbNbUnLU_fgNtFgd6EMzJ55OhM_Dn2Mdw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXECwHrEM_RQ3AbNbUnLU_fgNtFgd6EMzJ55OhM_Dn2Mdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> On 15. Mar 2023, at 23:51, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFOn Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 23:16, Marvin H=C3=A4user <mhaeuser@posteo=
.de> wrote:
>>=20
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> Why does the title mention X64? =46rom what I can see, PIE is unaffected f=
or X64 (and we really want it to be).
>>=20
>=20
> Why?

Why what? By =E2=80=9CPIE is unaffected for X64=E2=80=9D I meant by the patc=
h (which only changes IA32 macros, no?). I can also see how the last part is=
 a bit ambiguous, but I meant it literally - we really want X64 to be [unaff=
ected] (which it is, by the patch, but the title implies otherwise, doesn=E2=
=80=99t it?).

Best regards,
Marvin=