From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] MdeModulePkg/SdMmc: Add break to avoid dead loop when polling OCR Reg
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 05:12:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A0931C7BA95@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f63c297c6a1cffb1b56c621f3b4d7e0f0087d820.1489375413.git.feng.tian@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tian, Feng
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 11:24 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Wu, Hao A
> Subject: [patch] MdeModulePkg/SdMmc: Add break to avoid dead loop when
> polling OCR Reg
>
> At worst case, OCR register may always not set BIT31. It will cause
> original code enter to dead loop. Adding a break for such case.
>
> Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c | 9 ++++++++-
> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c | 8 ++++++++
> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/EmmcBlockIoPei/EmmcHci.c | 9 ++++++++-
> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/SdBlockIoPei/SdHci.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> index 9dbec10..6653a87 100755
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c
> @@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ EmmcIdentification (
> EFI_SD_MMC_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL *PassThru;
> UINT32 Ocr;
> UINT16 Rca;
> + UINTN Retry;
>
> PciIo = Private->PciIo;
> PassThru = &Private->PassThru;
> @@ -1119,7 +1120,8 @@ EmmcIdentification (
> return Status;
> }
>
> - Ocr = 0;
> + Ocr = 0;
> + Retry = 0;
> do {
> Status = EmmcGetOcr (PassThru, Slot, &Ocr);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> @@ -1127,6 +1129,11 @@ EmmcIdentification (
> return Status;
> }
> Ocr |= BIT30;
> +
> + if (Retry++ == 100) {
Hi Feng,
Maybe a debug message can be added here to indicate the type of error,
like other error handling logics in this function.
Apart from that, the patch is good to me.
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
> + return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> + }
> + gBS->Stall(10 * 1000);
> } while ((Ocr & BIT31) == 0);
>
> Status = EmmcGetAllCid (PassThru, Slot);
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c
> index 9122848..1da0849 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c
> @@ -1017,6 +1017,7 @@ SdCardIdentification (
> UINT8 PowerCtrl;
> UINT32 PresentState;
> UINT8 HostCtrl2;
> + UINTN Retry;
>
> PciIo = Private->PciIo;
> PassThru = &Private->PassThru;
> @@ -1097,12 +1098,19 @@ SdCardIdentification (
> // Note here we only support the cards complied with SD physical
> // layer simplified spec version 2.0 and version 3.0 and above.
> //
> + Ocr = 0;
> + Retry = 0;
> do {
> Status = SdCardSendOpCond (PassThru, Slot, 0, Ocr, S18r, Xpc, TRUE, &Ocr);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "SdCardIdentification: SdCardSendOpCond fails
> with %r Ocr %x, S18r %x, Xpc %x\n", Status, Ocr, S18r, Xpc));
> return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> }
> +
> + if (Retry++ == 100) {
> + return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> + }
> + gBS->Stall(10 * 1000);
> } while ((Ocr & BIT31) == 0);
>
> //
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/EmmcBlockIoPei/EmmcHci.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/EmmcBlockIoPei/EmmcHci.c
> index 2c0baca..5cb20a3 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/EmmcBlockIoPei/EmmcHci.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/EmmcBlockIoPei/EmmcHci.c
> @@ -2827,6 +2827,7 @@ EmmcPeimIdentification (
> EFI_STATUS Status;
> UINT32 Ocr;
> UINT32 Rca;
> + UINTN Retry;
>
> Status = EmmcPeimReset (Slot);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> @@ -2834,13 +2835,19 @@ EmmcPeimIdentification (
> return Status;
> }
>
> - Ocr = 0;
> + Ocr = 0;
> + Retry = 0;
> do {
> Status = EmmcPeimGetOcr (Slot, &Ocr);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "EmmcPeimIdentification: EmmcPeimGetOcr fails
> with %r\n", Status));
> return Status;
> }
> +
> + if (Retry++ == 100) {
> + return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> + }
> + MicroSecondDelay (10 * 1000);
> } while ((Ocr & BIT31) == 0);
>
> Status = EmmcPeimGetAllCid (Slot);
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/SdBlockIoPei/SdHci.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/SdBlockIoPei/SdHci.c
> index 23e6563..81076ba 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/SdBlockIoPei/SdHci.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/SdBlockIoPei/SdHci.c
> @@ -2754,7 +2754,7 @@ SdPeimIdentification (
> UINT32 PresentState;
> UINT8 HostCtrl2;
> SD_HC_SLOT_CAP Capability;
> -
> + UINTN Retry;
> //
> // 1. Send Cmd0 to the device
> //
> @@ -2842,12 +2842,19 @@ SdPeimIdentification (
> // Note here we only support the cards complied with SD physical
> // layer simplified spec version 2.0 and version 3.0 and above.
> //
> + Ocr = 0;
> + Retry = 0;
> do {
> Status = SdPeimSendOpCond (Slot, 0, Ocr, S18r, Xpc, TRUE, &Ocr);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "SdPeimIdentification: SdPeimSendOpCond fails
> with %r Ocr %x, S18r %x, Xpc %x\n", Status, Ocr, S18r, Xpc));
> return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> }
> +
> + if (Retry++ == 100) {
> + return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> + }
> + MicroSecondDelay (10 * 1000);
> } while ((Ocr & BIT31) == 0);
>
> //
> --
> 2.7.1.windows.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-13 3:23 [patch] MdeModulePkg/SdMmc: Add break to avoid dead loop when polling OCR Reg Feng Tian
2017-03-13 5:12 ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A0931C7BA95@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox