From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: introduce SD/MMC override protocol
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:09:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A0931D27658@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5697a7e7-4994-1528-0c98-ad03efafb7e0@Intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ruiyu
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 6:35 PM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel; Wu, Hao A
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Leif Lindholm; Tian, Feng; Zeng, Star
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: introduce SD/MMC override
> protocol
>
> On 12/5/2017 6:24 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 5 December 2017 at 10:12, Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Some comments re the detailed interfaces embedded in below.
> >>
> >> On 11/30/2017 6:11 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Many ARM based SoCs have integrated SDHCI controllers, and often,
> >>> these implementations deviate in subtle ways from the pertinent
> >>> specifications. On the one hand, these deviations are quite easy
> >>> to work around, but on the other hand, having a collection of SoC
> >>> specific workarounds in the generic driver stack is undesirable.
> >>>
> >>> So let's introduce an optional SD/MMC override protocol that we
> >>> can invoke at the appropriate moments in the device initialization.
> >>> That way, the workaround itself remains platform specific, but we
> >>> can still use the generic driver stack on such platforms.
> >>>
> >>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h | 103
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 3 +
> >>> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> >>> b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..5a5c393896f4
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> >>> +/** @file
> >>> + Protocol to describe overrides required to support non-standard SDHCI
> >>> + implementations
> >>> ...
> >>> + IN EFI_SD_MMC_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL *PassThru,
> >>> + IN EFI_HANDLE ControllerHandle,
> >>> + IN UINT8 Slot,
> >>> + IN OUT UINT64 *SdMmcHcSlotCapability
> >>> + );
> >>
> >>
> >> Is this API too specific?
> >> Besides SlotCapability, is there any other attributes that may need
> >> override as well?
> >>
> >
> > The capability structure is the root data structure that describes the
> > SD/MMC host controller. Which other data structures did you have in
> > mind?
> >
>
> I do not know either.
> Hao, any comments?
The service is overriding the 'Capability' field of the private data
structure within the HC driver. It's the value read from the 'CAP'
register of the SD/MMC HC.
After a glance of the other fields in 'SD_MMC_HC_PRIVATE_DATA', maybe the
'MaxCurrent' field is another candidate can be overriden. However, I am
not sure about this.
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ray
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 10:11 [PATCH v2 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: introduce SD/MMC override protocol Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-05 7:08 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-12-05 7:20 ` Zeng, Star
2017-12-05 8:37 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-12-05 8:50 ` Zeng, Star
2017-12-05 9:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-05 10:12 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-12-05 10:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-05 10:33 ` Zeng, Star
2017-12-05 10:34 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-12-05 13:09 ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
2017-12-05 17:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: allow HC capabilities to be overridden Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-05 12:46 ` Wu, Hao A
2017-12-04 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-05 2:08 ` Zeng, Star
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A0931D27658@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox