public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"nadavh@marvell.com" <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	"jsd@semihalf.com" <jsd@semihalf.com>,
	Tomasz Michalec <tm@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:48:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C82A4E1@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPv3WKeixia=PC+bOAg+q_7UY9etE_hZKxMrTH=D1fHBJ5rRbw@mail.gmail.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcin Wojtas [mailto:mw@semihalf.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 1:33 PM
> To: Wu, Hao A
> Cc: edk2-devel-01; Tian, Feng; Kinney, Michael D; Gao, Liming; Leif Lindholm;
> Ard Biesheuvel; nadavh@marvell.com; jsd@semihalf.com; Tomasz Michalec
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension
> 
> Hi Hao,
> 
> pt., 12 paź 2018 o 07:25 Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com> napisał(a):
> >
> > Hi Marcin,
> >
> > Please grant me some time for this series.
> >
> > Since I found that the extension of the SdMmc override protocol (mainly
> > the 3rd and 4th patch of the series) may have something overlaps with a
> > (internal) request to configure the driver strength parameter and operating
> > clock frequency of the SD/EMMC devices.
> >
> > For the (driver strength/operating freq) customize, we already have a
> > proposal on the way. So I am wondering if you could grant me some time
> to
> > investigate whether both the cases can be addressed together based on
> your
> > proposed patch.
> >
> 
> Sure. I'm only wondering if it's not best to collect all remarks and
> maybe update to v3 both edk2 and edk2-platforms sides (so far the
> issues have been not critical, such as typos, parameters' names,
> etc.). In the meantime you would be able to validate if the solution
> is sufficient for you as well. What do you think? When do you expect
> to be able to look at it vs your internal requirements more deeply?
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcin

I think you can hold the new version of the patch if the feedbacks do not
lead to considerable changes. At this moment, I can barely take time for
the evaluation. I think I will be able to fully shift to this in about 2
weeks. Does it sound acceptable to you with regard to the urgency level
for the series?

I will try my best to move up the process. Sorry again for the possible
delay.

Best Regards,
Hao Wu

> 
> 
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hao Wu
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marcin Wojtas [mailto:mw@semihalf.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 9:25 PM
> > > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > Cc: Tian, Feng; Kinney, Michael D; Gao, Liming; leif.lindholm@linaro.org;
> Wu,
> > > Hao A; ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; nadavh@marvell.com;
> > > mw@semihalf.com; jsd@semihalf.com; tm@semihalf.com
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is the second version of the patchset. Initial one was
> > > interleaved with the fixes, which after split got already merged.
> > > The biggest change is - resigning from the new callbacks
> > > and extending parameter lists of both NotifyPhase and Capability
> > > routines.
> > >
> > > Patches are available in the github:
> > > https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/edk2-open-
> > > platform/commits/sdmmc-override-upstream-r20181005
> > >
> > > Please note that extending SdMmcOverride protocol was impacting
> > > so far the only user of it (Synquacer controller). In paralel
> > > edk2-platforms patchset, a patch can be found:
> > > ("Silicon/SynQuacer/PlatformDxe: adjust to updated SdMmcOverride")
> > > which immunizes for above and future extensions of the protocol:
> > > https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/edk2-open-
> > > platform/commits/xenon-upstream-r20181005
> > >
> > > I'm looking forward to the comments and remarks.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Marcin
> > >
> > > Changelog:
> > > v1 -> v2
> > > * Rebase onto newest master
> > > * 1/4 [new patch] - preparation for extending NotifyPhase
> > > * 2/4 - UhsSignaling as a part of NotifyPhase
> > > * 3/4 - SwitchClockFreqPost as a part of NotifyPhase
> > > * 4/4 - Allow updating BaseClkFreq via Capability instead of the
> > >         independent callback.
> > >
> > > Marcin Wojtas (2):
> > >   MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add an optional parameter in
> > > NotifyPhase
> > >   MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Allow overriding base clock frequency
> > >
> > > Tomasz Michalec (2):
> > >   MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add UhsSignaling to SdMmcOverride
> > > protocol
> > >   MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add SwitchClockFreqPost to
> > > SdMmcOverride
> > >
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h |   6 +
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h   |  62 +++++-
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h      |  12 +-
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c    | 215
> > > ++++++++++++++------
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c      |  57 +++++-
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c |  18 +-
> > >  MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c   | 108
> ++++++++-
> > > -
> > >  7 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-05 13:25 [PATCH v2 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-05 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add an optional parameter in NotifyPhase Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 12:21   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-05 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add UhsSignaling to SdMmcOverride protocol Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-05 15:12   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-10-05 15:17     ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 12:41   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-08 12:59     ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 13:07       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-08 13:17         ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 13:27           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-08 13:37             ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 13:43               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-08 14:52                 ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 15:10                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-09 11:22                     ` Wu, Hao A
2018-10-09 11:32                       ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-09 11:45                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-09 11:51                           ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-11 15:43                             ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-12  1:39                               ` Wu, Hao A
2018-10-12  5:06                                 ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-12 15:55                                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-12 16:04                                     ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-12 16:24                                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-12 16:49                                         ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-01  7:04   ` Wu, Hao A
2018-11-02  8:21     ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-02 12:16       ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-03  2:57         ` Wu, Hao A
2018-10-05 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add SwitchClockFreqPost to SdMmcOverride Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 12:44   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-01  7:06   ` Wu, Hao A
2018-11-02  9:39     ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-03  3:19       ` Wu, Hao A
2018-10-05 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Allow overriding base clock frequency Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-08 12:49   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-01  7:11   ` Wu, Hao A
2018-11-02  9:52     ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-12  5:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension Wu, Hao A
2018-10-12  5:33   ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-12 12:48     ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
2018-10-12 12:50       ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-25 12:43         ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-10-26  7:22           ` Wu, Hao A
2018-11-01  7:11 ` Wu, Hao A
2018-11-02 10:09   ` Marcin Wojtas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C82A4E1@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox