From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Phillips, D Scott" <d.scott.phillips@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg dependency
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 07:49:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C8E4FAF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453b7e3c48014bd651717ccf9d9380356530bc82.camel@infradead.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2@infradead.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 3:37 PM
> To: Justen, Jordan L; Wu, Hao A; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray; Laszlo Ersek; Ard Biesheuvel; Phillips, D Scott
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg
> dependency
>
> On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 00:35 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > I see that https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1811
> > mentions that there is "missing of reviewer/maintainer of the CSM
> > modules in OvmfPkg", so it will be dropped. Yet, I thought David
> > agreed to maintain that support as recently as May 20:
> >
> > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41049
> >
> > Maybe he changed his mind about it?
>
> No, I'm happy to do it. Just been fairly busy recently.
>
> There appears to be nothing actually on fire this week. I may actually
> get to spend some quality time making sure it works again.
Hello all,
For the series:
[PATCH v2 00/10] Duplicate required CSM components for OVMF
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41385
I sent it out on May 27th, and did not receive a confirmation from David
for about 2 weeks. I think maybe the CSM support on OVMF is no longer
cared, and thus I sent another series today to drop such support:
[PATCH v1 0/2] OVMF: Drop CSM support
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42142
Please help to provide some feedbacks/confirmation on what should I do for
the next step. (This task actually blocks our proposal to remove
IntelFramework[Module]Pkg from edk2.)
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-11 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 1:43 [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg dependency Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: Remove redundant reference of framework pkg DEC Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec: Add PcdShellFile in OVMF DEC file Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: Use PcdShellFile defined in OvmfPkg Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] OvmfPkg/DSC: Remove the consume of PcdShellFile in framework package Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] OvmfPkg: Copy LegacyBios protocol definitions from IntelFrameworkPkg Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 1:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] OvmfPkg/IncompatiblePciDeviceSupportDxe: Drop framework pkg dependency Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 6:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Ovmf: Drop IntelFramework[Module]Pkg dependency Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-11 7:35 ` Jordan Justen
2019-06-11 7:37 ` David Woodhouse
2019-06-11 7:49 ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
2019-06-11 8:01 ` David Woodhouse
2019-06-11 8:06 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-06-12 1:19 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-06-12 2:04 ` Ni, Ray
2019-06-12 2:13 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-06-12 7:58 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-06-12 8:03 ` David Woodhouse
2019-06-12 11:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-06-12 12:08 ` [edk2-devel] " David Woodhouse
2019-06-13 5:47 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-06-12 15:15 ` David Woodhouse
2019-06-12 16:28 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-06-12 9:50 ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C8E4FAF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox