From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"siadriravikumaruefi@gmail.com" <siadriravikumaruefi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] ExtScsiPassThru support for Logical SCSI devices
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:55:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C8EDC2A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHPR0Q1nPMq-ZzyKu34xNw4WdPMVpMk4fhwexXr7MJYJT4o1PA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2528 bytes --]
Hello Ravi Kumar,
Inline comments below:
From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ravi Kumar Siadri
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 12:01 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] ExtScsiPassThru support for Logical SCSI devices
Hi,
Can someone help me in clarifying my queries ??
Thanks,
Ravi Kumar
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:55 PM Ravi Kumar Siadri <siadriravikumaruefi@gmail.com<mailto:siadriravikumaruefi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have couple of queries regarding the EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_LOGICAL attribute support in EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL.
1.
The Attributes field of the EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL interface tells if the interface is for physical SCSI devices or logical SCSI devices. Drivers for non-RAID SCSI controllers will set both the EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_PHYSICAL, and the EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_LOGICAL bits.
If the Drivers is for non-RAID SCSI controllers why to set the EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_LOGICAL bit. Will there be any case that non-RAID SCSI controllers have Logical devices connected to it ??
Per my understanding, every partition on a physical HW device will be treated
as a logical device by the firmware.
So for non-RAID case, both bits will be set for the PassThru protocol produced
for the physical device.
2.
Drivers for RAID controllers that allow access to the physical devices and logical devices will produce two EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL interfaces:
One with the just the EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_PHYSICAL bit set and another with just the EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_LOGICAL bit set. One interface can be used to access the physical devices attached to the RAID controller, and the other can be used to access the logical devices attached to the RAID controller for its current configuration.
Any background why EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL needed 2 instances ? why can't we install attributes EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_LOGICAL and EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_PHYSICAL on same Instance ??
How User locates the Instance with EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_LOGICAL bit set and Instance with EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_ATTRIBUTES_PHYSICAL bit set. ??
UEFI spec allows RAID drivers to only produce one PassThru protocol interface
with just the XXX_PASS_THRU_LOGICAL bit set when the RAID controller select to
not allow direct access to the underlying physical devices.
Thanks,
Ravi Kumar
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 29670 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAHPR0Q2RMR2TXUgHchw5X-ojRx7DQL1xBisucHsVxxfc28Hd=w@mail.gmail.com>
2019-06-12 4:00 ` ExtScsiPassThru support for Logical SCSI devices Ravi Kumar Siadri
2019-06-12 7:55 ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
2019-06-13 8:18 ` [edk2-devel] " Ravi Kumar Siadri
2019-06-14 5:51 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-07-07 6:58 ` Ravi Kumar Siadri
2019-07-08 3:09 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-07-08 8:35 ` Ravi Kumar Siadri
2019-07-11 12:59 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-06-10 12:32 Ravi Kumar Siadri
2019-07-12 22:10 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-07-15 5:25 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-07-18 16:02 ` Ravi Kumar Siadri
2019-07-18 21:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C8EDC2A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox