From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: Fix wrong queue size for async IO queues
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:51:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C95BFC2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114050141.18352-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Hello Ray and Jian,
I plan to push this bug fix before the upcoming stable tag, could you help to
review this patch? Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 1:02 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Sean Brogan; Wang, Jian J; Ni, Ray; Wu, Hao A
> Subject: [PATCH v1] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: Fix wrong queue size for
> async IO queues
>
> From: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
>
> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2118
>
> When a packet is queued/completed for the asynchronous IO queue, the logic
> to roll over to the front of the queue doesn't account for actual size of
> the IO Submission/Completion queue.
>
> This causes a device to hang due to doorbell being outside of visible
> queue. An example would be if an NVMe drive only supported a queue size of
> 128 while the driver supports 256.
>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpress.c | 2 +-
> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpress.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpress.c
> index 3bde96bc95..62886d5c91 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpress.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpress.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ ProcessAsyncTaskList (
> }
>
> Private->CqHdbl[QueueId].Cqh++;
> - if (Private->CqHdbl[QueueId].Cqh > NVME_ASYNC_CCQ_SIZE) {
> + if (Private->CqHdbl[QueueId].Cqh > MIN (NVME_ASYNC_CCQ_SIZE, Private-
> >Cap.Mqes)) {
> Private->CqHdbl[QueueId].Cqh = 0;
> Private->Pt[QueueId] ^= 1;
> }
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c
> index 8e72137946..e9357b1239 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c
> @@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ NvmExpressPassThru (
> NVME_SQ *Sq;
> NVME_CQ *Cq;
> UINT16 QueueId;
> + UINT16 QueueSize;
> UINT32 Bytes;
> UINT16 Offset;
> EFI_EVENT TimerEvent;
> @@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ NvmExpressPassThru (
> Prp = NULL;
> TimerEvent = NULL;
> Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
> + QueueSize = MIN (NVME_ASYNC_CSQ_SIZE, Private->Cap.Mqes) + 1;
>
> if (Packet->QueueType == NVME_ADMIN_QUEUE) {
> QueueId = 0;
> @@ -552,7 +554,7 @@ NvmExpressPassThru (
> //
> // Submission queue full check.
> //
> - if ((Private->SqTdbl[QueueId].Sqt + 1) % (NVME_ASYNC_CSQ_SIZE + 1) ==
> + if ((Private->SqTdbl[QueueId].Sqt + 1) % QueueSize ==
> Private->AsyncSqHead) {
> return EFI_NOT_READY;
> }
> @@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ NvmExpressPassThru (
> //
> if ((Event != NULL) && (QueueId != 0)) {
> Private->SqTdbl[QueueId].Sqt =
> - (Private->SqTdbl[QueueId].Sqt + 1) % (NVME_ASYNC_CSQ_SIZE + 1);
> + (Private->SqTdbl[QueueId].Sqt + 1) % QueueSize;
> } else {
> Private->SqTdbl[QueueId].Sqt ^= 1;
> }
> --
> 2.12.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-14 5:01 [PATCH v1] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: Fix wrong queue size for async IO queues Wu, Hao A
2019-11-15 2:51 ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
2019-11-15 3:28 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-18 1:05 ` Wu, Hao A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C95BFC2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox