From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 03:12:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C98DA40@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C3D0651@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Ray and Eric, thanks a lot for the review.
Hello Laszlo,
It seems that you are out of office, I plan to push the series without your
comments first. If you have feedbacks/comments with regard to the series, I
will follow up for the potential refine/revert of the series.
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2020 10:40 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wu, Hao A
> Cc: Dong, Eric; Laszlo Ersek; Zeng, Star; Fu, Siyuan; Kinney, Michael D
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations
>
> Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Wu,
> Hao
> > A
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 8:49 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>;
> Ni,
> > Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Zeng, Star
> > <star.zeng@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Kinney,
> Michael
> > D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations
> >
> > Series is also available at:
> > https://github.com/hwu25/edk2/tree/mpinitlib_opt_v5
> >
> > V5 changes:
> > A. For patch 2, address a typo to resolve enlarging the microcode patch
> > information buffer too early when it is not full;
> > B. For patch 4, relocate the logic of storing detected microcode patch
> > before the application of microcode patch.
> >
> > V4 history:
> > A. For patch 2, keep the calling sequence of functions:
> > MicrocodeDetect() and MtrrGetAllMtrrs() unchanged for BSP.
> > B. For patch 2, in function LoadMicrocodePatch(), add the missing logic
> > that handles the Extended Signature Table of a microcode patch.
> >
> >
> > V3 history:
> > For patch 3, correct license information for newly added header file.
> >
> > V2 history:
> > A. For patch 2, rename function parameters and variables to better reflect
> > their usage;
> > B. For patch 2, remove unneeded check in LoadMicrocodePatchWorker();
> > C. For patch 3, rename a couple of fields in the HOB structure;
> > D. For patch 3, update the 'ProcessorSpecificPatchOffset' field to point
> > to the microcode patch header instead of microcode patch data;
> > E. Add a new patch 5 to address an issue that certain fields in the
> > CPU_MP_DATA structure cannot be passed from PEI phase to DXE phase;
> > F. Add a new patch 6 to remove the redundant microcode related fields in
> > the CPU_MP_DATA structure.
> >
> > V1 history:
> > This series will introduce a couple of optimizations to the MpInitLib with
> > regard to microcode:
> >
> > A. Reduce the copy size when loading the microcode patches data from
> flash
> > into memory;
> > B. Produce a HOB to contain microcode patches information for
> subsequent
> > consumers of the microcode patches during the boot flow.
> >
> > Uni-test done for the series:
> > A. System boot to OS/Shell successfully on a real platform;
> > B. Add debug message to verify the same microcode patch is applied to
> each
> > processor before and after the series.
> >
> >
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> >
> > Hao A Wu (6):
> > UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Collect processors' CPUID & Platform ID info
> > UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Reduce the size when loading microcode patches
> > UefiCpuPkg: Add definitions for EDKII microcode patch HOB
> > UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Produce EDKII microcode patch HOB
> > UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate microcode patch fields in CPU_MP_DATA
> > UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant microcode fields in
> > CPU_MP_DATA
> >
> > UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dec | 3 +
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpInitLib.inf | 1 +
> > UefiCpuPkg/Include/Guid/MicrocodePatchHob.h | 44 +++
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h | 59 +++-
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c | 351
> ++++++++++++++++++-
> > -
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 110 +++---
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpLib.c | 55 +++
> > 7 files changed, 513 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 UefiCpuPkg/Include/Guid/MicrocodePatchHob.h
> >
> > --
> > 2.12.0.windows.1
> >
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-02 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-31 0:49 [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations Wu, Hao A
2019-12-31 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Collect processors' CPUID & Platform ID info Wu, Hao A
2019-12-31 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Reduce the size when loading microcode patches Wu, Hao A
2019-12-31 1:17 ` Dong, Eric
2019-12-31 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] UefiCpuPkg: Add definitions for EDKII microcode patch HOB Wu, Hao A
2019-12-31 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Produce " Wu, Hao A
2019-12-31 1:17 ` [edk2-devel] " Dong, Eric
2019-12-31 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate microcode patch fields in CPU_MP_DATA Wu, Hao A
2019-12-31 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant microcode " Wu, Hao A
2020-01-02 2:39 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations Ni, Ray
2020-01-02 3:12 ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
2020-01-02 15:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-03 20:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-06 1:36 ` Wu, Hao A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C98DA40@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox