Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations

["Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2020 4:09 AM
> To: Wu, Hao A; Ni, Ray; Dong, Eric; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Zeng, Star; Fu, Siyuan; Kinney, Michael D
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations
> 
> Hello Hao,
> 
> On 01/02/20 16:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 01/02/20 04:12, Wu, Hao A wrote:
> >> Ray and Eric, thanks a lot for the review.
> >>
> >> Hello Laszlo,
> >> It seems that you are out of office, I plan to push the series without your
> >> comments first. If you have feedbacks/comments with regard to the
> series, I
> >> will follow up for the potential refine/revert of the series.
> >
> > Just returned today. I'm now working to regain control of my mailbox.
> >
> > The above procedure works fine for me; in fact I would have suggested it
> > myself. In case I encounter a regression with OVMF, I'll report it.
> 
> I've now run some regression tests [*], with OVMF built at commit
> b948a496150f ("UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Pre-allocate
> PROCEDURE_TOKEN
> buffer", 2020-01-02). At that stage, the tree contains your present
> patch series too (which ends at commit fd30b0070773).
> 
> [*] Including, but a bit more than,
> <https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Testing-SMM-with-
> QEMU,-KVM-and-libvirt#tests-to-perform-in-the-installed-guest-fedora-26-
> guest>.
> Basically my usual Linux guest tests.
> 
> 
> I haven't noticed any regressions.


Got it, thanks a lot for the testing effort.

Best Regards,
Hao Wu


> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo