From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.25.1578274602589221439 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 17:36:42 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: intel.com, ip: 192.55.52.43, mailfrom: hao.a.wu@intel.com) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jan 2020 17:36:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,400,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="215052620" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2020 17:36:41 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 17:36:41 -0800 Received: from shsmsx105.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.158) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 17:36:41 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.197]) by SHSMSX105.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.28]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:36:39 +0800 From: "Wu, Hao A" To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "lersek@redhat.com" , "Ni, Ray" , "Dong, Eric" CC: "Zeng, Star" , "Fu, Siyuan" , "Kinney, Michael D" Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations Thread-Topic: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations Thread-Index: AQHVv3QkzXmh1JjSQ0mnLUNNOCJZyKfWJrwAgACK95CAAEYfgIAB5nQAgAQFi6A= Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 01:36:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20191231004914.8520-1-hao.a.wu@intel.com> <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C3D0651@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <93c482ce-808d-4257-dc49-c60b1ec03059@redhat.com> <6fa00014-d907-4961-f5d7-0c2f7cbe1b62@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <6fa00014-d907-4961-f5d7-0c2f7cbe1b62@redhat.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: hao.a.wu@intel.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > -----Original Message----- > From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2020 4:09 AM > To: Wu, Hao A; Ni, Ray; Dong, Eric; devel@edk2.groups.io > Cc: Zeng, Star; Fu, Siyuan; Kinney, Michael D > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations >=20 > Hello Hao, >=20 > On 01/02/20 16:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > On 01/02/20 04:12, Wu, Hao A wrote: > >> Ray and Eric, thanks a lot for the review. > >> > >> Hello Laszlo, > >> It seems that you are out of office, I plan to push the series without= your > >> comments first. If you have feedbacks/comments with regard to the > series, I > >> will follow up for the potential refine/revert of the series. > > > > Just returned today. I'm now working to regain control of my mailbox. > > > > The above procedure works fine for me; in fact I would have suggested i= t > > myself. In case I encounter a regression with OVMF, I'll report it. >=20 > I've now run some regression tests [*], with OVMF built at commit > b948a496150f ("UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Pre-allocate > PROCEDURE_TOKEN > buffer", 2020-01-02). At that stage, the tree contains your present > patch series too (which ends at commit fd30b0070773). >=20 > [*] Including, but a bit more than, > QEMU,-KVM-and-libvirt#tests-to-perform-in-the-installed-guest-fedora-26- > guest>. > Basically my usual Linux guest tests. >=20 >=20 > I haven't noticed any regressions. Got it, thanks a lot for the testing effort. Best Regards, Hao Wu >=20 > Thanks! > Laszlo