From: "Zhu, Yonghong" <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
To: "Carsey, Jaben" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"Tomas Pilar (tpilar)" <tpilar@solarflare.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf OptionROM override
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:53:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B9726D6DCCFB8B4CA276A9169B02216D5213E94F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CB6E33457884FA40993F35157061515CA415F6DB@FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Pilar,
Will you update a V2 to cover Jaben's comment ?
Best Regards,
Zhu Yonghong
-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Carsey, Jaben
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 11:00 PM
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Tomas Pilar (tpilar) <tpilar@solarflare.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf OptionROM override
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Gao, Liming
> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2018 6:42 PM
> To: Tomas Pilar (tpilar) <tpilar@solarflare.com>;
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in
> Fdf OptionROM override
>
> Pilar:
> The change is good. Could you also update INF and FDF spec for this usage?
> If you don't know how to update INF and FDF spec, please submit BZ. I
> will provide the spec patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>
> Thanks
> Liming
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf
> >Of Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:46 PM
> >To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf
> >OptionROM override
> >
> >Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> >Signed-off-by: Tomas Pilar <tpilar@solarflare.com>
> >---
> > BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py | 11 ++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
> >b/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
> >index 63687e98bb..a65f2cfd2d 100644
> >--- a/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
> >+++ b/BaseTools/Source/Python/GenFds/FdfParser.py
> >@@ -4469,10 +4469,15 @@ class FdfParser:
> > if self.__IsKeyword( "PCI_DEVICE_ID"):
> > if not self.__IsToken( "="):
> > raise Warning("expected '='", self.FileName,
> >self.CurrentLineNumber)
> >- if not self.__GetNextHexNumber():
> >- raise Warning("expected Hex device id", self.FileName,
> >self.CurrentLineNumber)
> >
> >- Overrides.PciDeviceId = self.__Token
> >+ # Get a list of PCI IDs
> >+ Overrides.PciDeviceId = ""
> >+
> >+ while self.__GetNextHexNumber():
> >+ Overrides.PciDeviceId += " " + self.__Token
Can we change to minimize looping string concatenation here? This in a loop will cause lots of memory allocation/deallocation and slow things down.
Maybe :
Overrides.PciDeviceId = "{} {}".format(Overrides.PciDeviceId, self.__Token)
> >+
> >+ if not Overrides.PciDeviceId:
> >+ raise Warning("expected one or more Hex
> >+ device ids",
> >self.FileName, self.CurrentLineNumber)
> > continue
> >
> > if self.__IsKeyword( "PCI_REVISION"):
> >--
> >2.17.1
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >edk2-devel mailing list
> >edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-02 14:46 [PATCH] BaseTools: Allow multiple PciDeviceId in Fdf OptionROM override Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2018-10-02 14:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-10-08 1:41 ` Gao, Liming
2018-10-08 15:00 ` Carsey, Jaben
2018-10-12 5:53 ` Zhu, Yonghong [this message]
2018-10-24 10:15 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B9726D6DCCFB8B4CA276A9169B02216D5213E94F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox