public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
	Karunakar P <karunakarp@amiindia.co.in>,
	"'edk2-devel@lists.01.org'" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Different ISCSI behavior when 2 attempts are added
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 03:08:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BC0C045B0E2A584CA4575E779FA2C12A1A96DC5A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <895558F6EA4E3B41AC93A00D163B72741633C7A8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Yes, I agree that it is the implementation's choice. If you need Attempt 1 in Case 2&4, try to update "Enabled" to "Enabled for MPIO".

Thanks,
Ting Ye

From: Wu, Jiaxin
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 11:01 AM
To: Karunakar P <karunakarp@amiindia.co.in>; 'edk2-devel@lists.01.org' <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Different ISCSI behavior when 2 attempts are added

Hi Karunakar,

I think it's not the bug according the current  iSCSI implementation that the first login session will be selected while others are aborted directly. Here, IP4 is the first login session.

I didn't find any state that the first attempt should be connected. Ting and Siyuan, If anything wrong, please correct me.

Thanks,
Jiaxin

From: Karunakar P [mailto:karunakarp@amiindia.co.in]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:52 PM
To: 'edk2-devel@lists.01.org' <edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>>
Cc: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com<mailto:jiaxin.wu@intel.com>>; Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com<mailto:ting.ye@intel.com>>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com<mailto:siyuan.fu@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: Different ISCSI behavior when 2 attempts are added

Hello All,

Found the below behavior when I try for ISCSI connection with 2 Valid attempts.

Case 1:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP4----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt1(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt2 tried but session does not exist

Case 2:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP4----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt2(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt1 tried but session does not exist

Case 3:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---Autoconfigure --->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt1(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt2 tried but session does not exist

Case 4:
Attempt 1---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---IP6--->Valid Attempt
Attempt 2---Enabled(ISCSI Mode)---Autoconfigure ----Enabled(Initiator DHCP)---Disabled(Target DHCP)--->Valid Attempt
EDK2 RESULT:- Attempt2(IP4) connected and shown in shell ,Attempt1 tried but session does not exist



1.       Case1 & Case3 looks fine as 1st valid attempt connected

2.       But Case2 & Case4 looks bit different, 1St attempt was valid but connection success with 2nd attempt

3.       As we found that IScsiIp4 Driver Binding Start is getting call first and processing the IP4 attempt first even though it is 2nd attempt

Could you please comment on this whether this is a bug or Not?

Thanks,
Karunakar


  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-09 14:51 Different ISCSI behavior when 2 attempts are added Karunakar P
2017-10-10  3:00 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2017-10-10  3:08   ` Ye, Ting [this message]
2017-10-10  3:26     ` Karunakar P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BC0C045B0E2A584CA4575E779FA2C12A1A96DC5A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox