From: "Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>
To: "Tomas Pilar (tpilar)" <tpilar@solarflare.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: Network Stack Budgeting
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:14:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BC0C045B0E2A584CA4575E779FA2C12A1AB9B1DA@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6029fb15-3820-0f05-f02a-577e99592bbc@solarflare.com>
Hi Tom,
As I known it is up to platform BDS when to connect network stack, or even not to connect network stack. For example, in fast boot process, network stack will not be connected thus Snp.Start() has no chance to be called.
May I know which platforms you see this issue?
Thanks,
Ting
-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 6:56 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [edk2] Network Stack Budgeting
Hi,
Recently I have done some performance improvements to my network driver. I am however finding that on some platforms, it's becoming impossible to boot if the network cable has a lot of traffic on it that is not filtered by the NIC itself (broadcast, multicast or directed unicast). It would seem the platform hangs in the DXE phase trying to process (drop) all the packets and not progressing through the boot order.
I am wondering if anyone has seen similar behaviour. Does the network stack have any budgeting?
Ideally this would be fixed by the network stack not calling Snp.Start() until in the BDS phase but it seems most platforms just call Snp.Start() immediately following the driver probe.
Cheers,
Tom
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 10:55 Network Stack Budgeting Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-23 14:14 ` Ye, Ting [this message]
2019-01-23 14:51 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-23 16:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-23 16:27 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-23 17:47 ` Andrew Fish
2019-01-23 22:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-24 11:37 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-24 12:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-24 12:58 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-24 13:25 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-24 16:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-24 17:43 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-25 8:44 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2019-01-25 12:08 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-27 14:28 ` Fu, Siyuan
2019-01-28 11:24 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-29 3:20 ` Fu, Siyuan
2019-01-29 10:54 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-29 13:06 ` Fu, Siyuan
2019-01-29 13:12 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
2019-01-29 13:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-29 13:52 ` Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BC0C045B0E2A584CA4575E779FA2C12A1AB9B1DA@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox