public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lu, Ken" <ken.lu@intel.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Xu, Min M" <min.m.xu@intel.com>,
	"Daniel Kiper" <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] measurement to command-line/initrd for loading kernel via -kernel option
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:24:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN8PR11MB3666B670948C83356604869A984F9@BN8PR11MB3666.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921071409.5oziya6kcfvkkkp7@sirius.home.kraxel.org>

> 
> > But either in GenericQemuLoadImageLib, it can do measurement for
> command line and initrd, correct?
> 
> Yes, it could.  But why given that the linux kernel efi stub measures anyway?

If the final decision is the measurement should be done by efi stub in Linux kernel. Do we also need remove today's measurement in Grub (I have submitted some patch for TDX in grub...)? According to Bottomley, the same measurement should not be done twice. Or only the one who use GenericQemuLoadImageLib, will give the Linux kernel efi stub for measure?
I hope the final decision could be a consistent approach across direct and grub boot, then we can follow.

> 
> take care,
>   Gerd


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-21 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-17  2:52 measurement to command-line/initrd for loading kernel via -kernel option Min Xu
2022-09-18 12:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-19  2:13   ` [edk2-devel] " Min Xu
2022-09-19  6:58     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-20  0:20       ` Min Xu
2022-09-20 12:29         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-20 12:55       ` Lu, Ken
2022-09-20 13:03         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-20 13:24           ` Lu, Ken
2022-09-20 13:43             ` James Bottomley
2022-09-20 14:34               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-20 14:51             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-20 15:14               ` Lu, Ken
2022-09-20 13:20         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-20 13:38           ` Lu, Ken
2022-09-20 14:18             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-20 14:30               ` Lu, Ken
2022-09-21  7:14                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-21 11:24                   ` Lu, Ken [this message]
2022-09-21 12:27                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-21 15:41                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-23  9:34                         ` Ilias Apalodimas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN8PR11MB3666B670948C83356604869A984F9@BN8PR11MB3666.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox