From: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"mhaeuser@posteo.de" <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
Cc: "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe: Mitigate memcpy intrinsics
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 05:15:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN8PR11MB3666CDC8DA06E365A970E4B3CAC19@BN8PR11MB3666.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7940825f202b4bbabc844f7ab57f6260a118ad2.1629057819.git.mhaeuser@posteo.de>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Marvin
> H?user
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 4:12 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>;
> Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@protonmail.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe: Mitigate
> memcpy intrinsics
>
> Assignments of structure values cause the emission of memcpy()
> intrinsics by the CLANG38 toolchain. Substitute the assignments with
> calls to CopyMem() to mitigate the issue.
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Will merge after the upcoming stable tag.
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@protonmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/Edb.c | 6 +++++-
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbCmdBreakpoint.c | 6
> +++++-
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbHook.c | 6 +++++-
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/Edb.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/Edb.c
> index 611b2de5d81f..e417f4870f3d 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/Edb.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/Edb.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ EdbCheckBreakpoint (
> //
>
> // If hit, record current breakpoint
>
> //
>
> - DebuggerPrivate-
> >DebuggerBreakpointContext[EFI_DEBUGGER_BREAKPOINT_MAX] =
> DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[Index];
>
> + CopyMem (
>
> + &DebuggerPrivate-
> >DebuggerBreakpointContext[EFI_DEBUGGER_BREAKPOINT_MAX],
>
> + &DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[Index],
>
> + sizeof (DebuggerPrivate-
> >DebuggerBreakpointContext[EFI_DEBUGGER_BREAKPOINT_MAX])
>
> + );
>
> DebuggerPrivate-
> >DebuggerBreakpointContext[EFI_DEBUGGER_BREAKPOINT_MAX].State =
> TRUE;
>
> //
>
> // Do not set Breakpoint flag. We record the address here just let it not
> patch breakpoint address when de-init.
>
> diff --git
> a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbCmdBreakpoint.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbCmdBreakpoint.c
> index e0c797be247f..5d32c684066e 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbCmdBreakpoint.c
> +++
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbCmdBreakpoint.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,11 @@ DebuggerBreakpointDel (
> // Delete this breakpoint
>
> //
>
> for (BpIndex = Index; BpIndex < DebuggerPrivate-
> >DebuggerBreakpointCount - 1; BpIndex++) {
>
> - DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[BpIndex] =
> DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[BpIndex + 1];
>
> + CopyMem (
>
> + &DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[BpIndex],
>
> + &DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[BpIndex + 1],
>
> + sizeof (DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[BpIndex])
>
> + );
>
> }
>
> ZeroMem (
>
> &DebuggerPrivate->DebuggerBreakpointContext[BpIndex],
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbHook.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbHook.c
> index 83257a2c25fe..1bfe5240c760 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbHook.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/EbcDebugger/EdbHook.c
> @@ -230,7 +230,11 @@ EbcDebuggerPushTraceDestEntry (
> //
>
> ASSERT
> (mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntry[EFI_DEBUGGER_TRACE_MAX].Type == Type);
>
> for (Index = 0; Index < EFI_DEBUGGER_TRACE_MAX; Index++) {
>
> - mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntry[Index] =
> mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntry[Index + 1];
>
> + CopyMem (
>
> + &mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntry[Index],
>
> + &mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntry[Index + 1],
>
> + sizeof (mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntry[Index])
>
> + );
>
> }
>
> mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntry[EFI_DEBUGGER_CALLSTACK_MAX -
> 1].DestAddress = DestEntry;
>
> mDebuggerPrivate.TraceEntryCount = EFI_DEBUGGER_TRACE_MAX;
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-20 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-15 20:11 [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe: Mitigate memcpy intrinsics Marvin Häuser
2021-08-20 5:15 ` Wu, Hao A [this message]
2021-08-30 1:59 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN8PR11MB3666CDC8DA06E365A970E4B3CAC19@BN8PR11MB3666.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox