From: "duntan" <dun.tan@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul R" <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V2 07/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib:Modify RandomTest to check Mask/Attr
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:49:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB548304C2081B6D95CF77B550E5BF9@BN9PR11MB5483.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN6PR11MB82444DD755C0130D4D56A46D8CBF9@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Thanks Ray for the comments. Will create a new patch to split the RandomBoolean() and simplify the code loop in random test
Thanks,
Dun
-----Original Message-----
From: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 1:49 PM
To: Tan, Dun <dun.tan@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Patch V2 07/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib:Modify RandomTest to check Mask/Attr
>
> -/**
> - Return a random boolean.
> -
> - @return boolean
> -**/
> -BOOLEAN
> -RandomBoolean (
> - VOID
> - )
> -{
> - BOOLEAN Value;
> -
> - LocalRandomBytes ((UINT8 *)&Value, sizeof (BOOLEAN));
> - return Value%2;
> -}
> -
> /**
> Return a 32bit random number.
>
> @@ -139,6 +123,21 @@ Random64 (
> return (UINT64)(Value % (Limit - Start + 1)) + Start; }
>
> +/**
> + Returns true with the percentage of input Probability.
> +
> + @param[in] Probability The percentage to return true.
> +
> + @return boolean
> +**/
> +BOOLEAN
> +RandomBoolean (
> + UINT8 Probability
> + )
> +{
> + return ((Probability > ((UINT8)Random64 (0, 100))) ? TRUE : FALSE);
> +}
1. can you split the RandomBoolean() change in standalone patch?
2. can you simplify below code to only use for-loop?
> + //
> + if (MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].Length > 0) {
> + if (MapCount != 0) {
> + UT_ASSERT_EQUAL (Status, RETURN_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL);
> + Map = AllocatePages (EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (MapCount * sizeof
> (IA32_MAP_ENTRY)));
> + ASSERT (Map != NULL);
> + Status = PageTableParse (*PageTable, PagingMode, Map,
> + &MapCount);
> +
> + if (Map[MapCount - 1].LinearAddress + Map[MapCount - 1].Length
> + <
> MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].LinearAddress + MapEntrys-
> >Maps[MapsIndex].Length) {
> + IsNotPresent = TRUE;
> + } else {
> + for (Index = 0; Index < MapCount; Index++) {
> + if ((PreviousAddress < Map[Index].LinearAddress) &&
> + (MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].LinearAddress <
> Map[Index].LinearAddress) &&
> + ((MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].LinearAddress + MapEntrys-
> >Maps[MapsIndex].Length) > PreviousAddress))
> + {
> + //
> + // MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex] contains not-present range
> + in
> exsiting page table.
> + //
> + IsNotPresent = TRUE;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + PreviousAddress = Map[Index].LinearAddress + Map[Index].Length;
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + IsNotPresent = TRUE;
> + }
> + }
>
> PageTableBufferSize = 0;
> Status = PageTableMap (
> @@ -638,6 +700,25 @@ SingleMapEntryTest (
> &MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].Attribute,
> &MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].Mask
> );
> +
> + //
> + // Return Status should be InvalidParameter when:
> + // 1. MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex] contains not-present range.
> + // 2. MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].Mask contains zero value field or
> Attribute->Bits.Present is 0.
> + //
> + Attribute = &MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].Attribute;
> + Mask = &MapEntrys->Maps[MapsIndex].Mask;
> + if (((Attribute->Bits.Present == 0) || (Mask->Bits.Present == 0) ||
> + (Mask-
> >Bits.ReadWrite == 0) ||
> + (Mask->Bits.UserSupervisor == 0) || (Mask->Bits.WriteThrough
> + == 0) ||
> (Mask->Bits.CacheDisabled == 0) ||
> + (Mask->Bits.Accessed == 0) || (Mask->Bits.Dirty == 0) ||
> + (Mask-
> >Bits.Pat == 0) || (Mask->Bits.Global == 0) ||
> + (Mask->Bits.PageTableBaseAddress == 0) ||
> + (Mask->Bits.ProtectionKey
> == 0) || (Mask->Bits.Nx == 0)) &&
> + IsNotPresent)
> + {
> + RemoveLastMapEntry (MapEntrys);
> + UT_ASSERT_EQUAL (Status, RETURN_INVALID_PARAMETER);
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> + }
> +
> if (PageTableBufferSize != 0) {
> UT_ASSERT_EQUAL (Status, RETURN_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL);
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/UnitTest/TestHelper.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/UnitTest/TestHelper.c
> index 5bd70c0f65..11f7e607ca 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/UnitTest/TestHelper.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/UnitTest/TestHelper.c
> @@ -171,6 +171,10 @@ IsPageTableValid (
> UNIT_TEST_STATUS Status;
> IA32_PAGING_ENTRY *PagingEntry;
>
> + if (PageTable == 0) {
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> + }
> +
> if ((PagingMode == Paging32bit) || (PagingMode == PagingPae) ||
> (PagingMode >= PagingModeMax)) {
> //
> // 32bit paging is never supported.
> --
> 2.31.1.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-15 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 10:07 [Patch V2 00/14] Fix issues in CpuPageTableLib duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 01/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Remove unneeded 'if' condition duntan
2023-03-15 1:23 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 1:23 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 1:45 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 02/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Add check for input Length duntan
2023-03-15 1:25 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 1:46 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 03/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Fix the non-1:1 mapping issue duntan
2023-03-15 1:28 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 1:44 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 04/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Fix issue when splitting leaf entry duntan
2023-03-15 1:51 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 05/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTebleLib: Check Mask and Attr in PageTableMap duntan
2023-03-15 5:33 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 9:49 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 06/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Add manual test to check Mask and Attr duntan
2023-03-15 5:36 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 07/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib:Modify RandomTest to check Mask/Attr duntan
2023-03-15 5:48 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 9:49 ` duntan [this message]
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 08/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Enable non-1:1 mapping in random test duntan
2023-03-15 5:49 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 09/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Add OUTPUT IsModified parameter duntan
2023-03-15 6:01 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 9:49 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 10/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Modify RandomTest to check IsModified duntan
2023-03-15 6:09 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 9:49 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 11/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Enable PAE paging duntan
2023-03-15 6:24 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 9:49 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 12/14] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Add RandomTest for " duntan
2023-03-15 6:27 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 13/14] UefiCpuPkg: Fix IA32 build failure in CpuPageTableLib.inf duntan
2023-03-15 6:35 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 9:49 ` duntan
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [Patch V2 14/14] UefiCpuPkg: Modify UnitTest code since tested API is changed duntan
2023-03-15 6:42 ` Ni, Ray
2023-03-15 9:26 ` Zhiguang Liu
2023-03-15 9:27 ` Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN9PR11MB548304C2081B6D95CF77B550E5BF9@BN9PR11MB5483.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox