public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guo Dong" <guo.dong@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: "Ma, Maurice" <maurice.ma@intel.com>,
	"You, Benjamin" <benjamin.you@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Remove PEI phase from Payload
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:47:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3622018DF0D71BDAEDC00E4C9EE20@BYAPR11MB3622.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005801d6bc7b$6b90f670$42b2e350$@byosoft.com.cn>


Thanks Liming. If so it is OK to merge it after this stable tag.

Thanks,
Guo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of gaoliming
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 5:49 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Dong, Guo <guo.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma@intel.com>; You, Benjamin
> <benjamin.you@intel.com>
> Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Remove PEI phase
> from Payload
> 
> Guo:
>   This is a feature. So, please submit BZ for it.
> 
>   And, the first version patch is sent before soft feature freeze, and got
> comments.
>   Then, the second version patch is sent and got reviewed after soft feature
> freeze.
> 
>   Based on
> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/SoftFeatureFreeze,
>   this patch can't catch this stable tag.
> 
>   If you really want to catch this patch for this stable tag, please specify
> your reason.
>   I will collect the community feedback and decide whether delay this stable
> tag.
> 
> Thanks
> Liming
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: bounce+27952+67620+4905953+8761045@groups.io
> > <bounce+27952+67620+4905953+8761045@groups.io> 代表 Guo Dong
> > 发送时间: 2020年11月17日 5:59
> > 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; Dong, Guo <guo.dong@intel.com>; gaoliming
> > <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> > 抄送: Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma@intel.com>; You, Benjamin
> > <benjamin.you@intel.com>
> > 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Remove PEI phase
> > from Payload
> >
> >
> > Hi Liming,
> >
> > This patch is sent before the soft freeze and passed review.
> > I would like to merge this patch into edk2-stable202011 tomorrow if there
> is
> > no additional feedback.
> >
> > And here is the PR and it passed all CI checks.
> > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1127
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guo
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Guo
> > Dong
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2020 5:35 PM
> > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma@intel.com>; You, Benjamin
> > > <benjamin.you@intel.com>
> > > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Remove PEI phase
> > from
> > > Payload
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > This patch removed UEFI payload PEI phase to make UEFI payload simple.
> > > It uses UefiPayloadEntry module to bridge bootloader and DXE phase.
> > >
> > > Original DSC files UefiPayloadIa32.dsc and UefiPayloadIa32X64.dsc
> > > are replaced by a single DSC UefiPayloadPkg.dsc. Pure IA32 support
> > > is replaced by Pure X64 support. IA32 Entry point with X64 DXE phase
> > > is still supported.
> > >
> > > Changes in V2:
> > > Addressed all the review comments from Maurice.
> > > Fixed debug msg in UefiPayloadEntry.
> > > Updated the Handoff HOB to DXE core to include Payload FV.
> > > Synced the GHCB changes from DxeIpl to UefiPayloadEntry.
> > >
> > > V1:
> > > It is not necessary to have a PEI phase in the UEFI payload since no
> > > specific PEI task is required. This patch adds a UefiPayloadEntry
> > > driver to get UEFI Payload required information from the bootloaders,
> > > convert them into a HOB list, load DXE core and transfer control to it.
> > >
> > > Here is the change details:
> > > 1) Removed PEI phase, including Peicore, BlSupportPei, SecCore, etc.
> > > 2) Added UefiPayloadEntry driver. this is the only driver before DXE
> core.
> > > 3) Added Pure X64 support, dropped Pure IA32 (Could add later if
> required)
> > >    64bit payload with 32bit entry point is still supported.
> > > 4) Use one DSC file UefiPayloadPkg.dsc to support X64 and IA32X64 build.
> > >    Removed UefiPayloadIa32.dsc and UefiPayloadIa32X64.dsc
> > >
> > > Tested with SBL and coreboot on QEMU.
> > >
> > > Refs: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1127
> > >
> > > CC: maurice.ma@intel.com
> > > CC: benjamin.you@intel.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Dong <guo.dong@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Guo Dong (1):
> > >   UefiPayloadPkg: Remove PEI phase from Payload
> > >
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.h         |  39 -
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.inf       |  73 --
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/BuildAndIntegrationInstructions.txt |  32 +-
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/Include/Library/BlParseLib.h        |   4 +-
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/Library/HobLib/Hob.c                | 706
> > ++++++++++++++++
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/Library/HobLib/HobLib.inf           |  39 +
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/FindPeiCore.c               | 193 -----
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/Ia32/SecEntry.nasm          |  78 --
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/Ia32/Stack.nasm             |  72 --
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/SecCore.inf                 |  58 --
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/SecMain.c                   | 288 -------
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/SecMain.h                   | 131 ---
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/Ia32/DxeLoadFunc.c | 365 ++++++++
> > >  .../UefiPayloadEntry/Ia32/IdtVectorAsm.nasm        |  71 ++
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/Ia32/SecEntry.nasm |  46 +
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/LoadDxeCore.c      | 307 +++++++
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/MemoryAllocation.c | 201 +++++
> > >  .../UefiPayloadEntry.c}                            | 451 ++++------
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/UefiPayloadEntry.h | 134 +++
> > >  .../UefiPayloadEntry/UefiPayloadEntry.inf          |  93 ++
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/X64/DxeLoadFunc.c  | 107 +++
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/X64/SecEntry.nasm  |  47 ++
> > >  .../UefiPayloadEntry/X64/VirtualMemory.c           | 939
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../UefiPayloadEntry/X64/VirtualMemory.h           | 330 ++++++++
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadPkg.dec                  |   5 +-
> > >  ...efiPayloadPkgIa32X64.dsc => UefiPayloadPkg.dsc} |  57 +-
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadPkg.fdf                  |  32 +-
> > >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadPkgIa32.dsc              | 585
> > -------------
> > >  28 files changed, 3576 insertions(+), 1907 deletions(-)
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.h
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.inf
> > >  create mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/Library/HobLib/Hob.c
> > >  create mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/Library/HobLib/HobLib.inf
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/FindPeiCore.c
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/Ia32/SecEntry.nasm
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/Ia32/Stack.nasm
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/SecCore.inf
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/SecMain.c
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/SecCore/SecMain.h
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/Ia32/DxeLoadFunc.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/Ia32/IdtVectorAsm.nasm
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/Ia32/SecEntry.nasm
> > >  create mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/LoadDxeCore.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/MemoryAllocation.c
> > >  rename UefiPayloadPkg/{BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.c =>
> > > UefiPayloadEntry/UefiPayloadEntry.c} (52%)
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/UefiPayloadEntry.h
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/UefiPayloadEntry.inf
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/X64/DxeLoadFunc.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/X64/SecEntry.nasm
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/X64/VirtualMemory.c
> > >  create mode 100644
> > UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadEntry/X64/VirtualMemory.h
> > >  rename UefiPayloadPkg/{UefiPayloadPkgIa32X64.dsc =>
> > UefiPayloadPkg.dsc}
> > > (90%)
> > >  delete mode 100644 UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadPkgIa32.dsc
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.16.2.windows.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1647D5DAE0E6DDAF.27572@groups.io>
2020-11-16 21:58 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Remove PEI phase from Payload Guo Dong
2020-11-17  0:48   ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-11-17 19:47     ` Guo Dong [this message]
2020-12-02  8:28       ` Patrick Rudolph
2020-12-02 23:14         ` Guo Dong
2020-11-16  0:35 Guo Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB3622018DF0D71BDAEDC00E4C9EE20@BYAPR11MB3622.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox