From: "Aaron Li" <aaron.li@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Chaganty, Rangasai V" <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>,
"Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/ShadowMicrocodePei: Add PCD for shadowing all microcode.
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 01:37:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3623AFDFD368B8DD04FB876E97390@BYAPR11MB3623.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB40078945DA7298143B06070E8C380@BY5PR11MB4007.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Ray,
Accroding to https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/files/Designs/2020/0214/Support%20the%202nd%20Microcode%20FV%20Flash%20Region.pdf
The ShadowMicrocodePei provide a FIT based shadow microcode ppi to MpInitLib. It's needed.
Best,
Aaron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:25 PM
> To: Li, Aaron <aaron.li@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan
> <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/ShadowMicrocodePei: Add PCD
> for shadowing all microcode.
>
> MpInitLib already contains logic to shadow microcode to memory.
> Is this still needed?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Li, Aaron <aaron.li@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 3:55 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> > <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/ShadowMicrocodePei: Add PCD for
> > shadowing all microcode.
> >
> > This patch is to add a PCD PcdShadowAllMicrocode to support shadowing
> > all microcode patch to memory.
> >
> > BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2891
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Li <aaron.li@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
> > Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> >
> Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocodeP
> ei.c
> > | 4 ++++
> >
> >
> Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocodeP
> ei.i
> > nf | 3 +++
> > Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dec | 7 +++++++
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> >
> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .c
> >
> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .c
> > index 8d6574f66794..5c7ee6910c8e 100644
> > ---
> >
> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .c
> > +++
> >
> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .c
> > @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ IsMicrocodePatchNeedLoad (
> > CPU_MICROCODE_EXTENDED_TABLE *ExtendedTable;
> >
> > UINTN Index;
> >
> >
> >
> > + if (FeaturePcdGet (PcdShadowAllMicrocode)) {
> >
> > + return TRUE;
> >
> > + }
> >
> > +
> >
> > //
> >
> > // Check the 'ProcessorSignature' and 'ProcessorFlags' in microcode patch
> > header.
> >
> > //
> >
> > diff --git
> >
> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .inf
> >
> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .inf
> > index 019400ab31da..581780add891 100644
> > ---
> >
> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .inf
> > +++
> >
> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/ShadowMicrocode/ShadowMicrocod
> ePei
> > .inf
> > @@ -39,5 +39,8 @@ [Guids]
> > gEdkiiMicrocodeShadowInfoHobGuid
> >
> > gEdkiiMicrocodeStorageTypeFlashGuid
> >
> >
> >
> > +[Pcd]
> >
> > + gIntelSiliconPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdShadowAllMicrocode
> >
> > +
> >
> > [Depex]
> >
> > TRUE
> >
> > diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dec
> > b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dec
> > index e4a7fec3a3ea..3a12fe99fac6 100644
> > --- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dec
> > +++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dec
> > @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ [Protocols]
> > # Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h
> >
> > gEdkiiDeviceSecurityPolicyProtocolGuid = {0x7ea41a99, 0x5e32, 0x4c97,
> > {0x88, 0xc4, 0xd6, 0xe7, 0x46, 0x84, 0x9, 0xd4}}
> >
> >
> >
> > +[PcdsFeatureFlag]
> >
> > + ## Indicates if all microcode update patches shall be shadowed to
> memory.
> >
> > + # TRUE - All microcode patches will be shadowed.<BR>
> >
> > + # FALSE - Only the microcode for current present processors will be
> > shadowed.<BR>
> >
> > + # @Prompt Shadow all microcode update patches.
> >
> > +
> >
> gIntelSiliconPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdShadowAllMicrocode|FALSE|BOOLEAN|
> 0x
> > 00000006
> >
> > +
> >
> > [PcdsFixedAtBuild, PcdsPatchableInModule]
> >
> > ## Error code for VTd error.<BR><BR>
> >
> > # EDKII_ERROR_CODE_VTD_ERROR = (EFI_IO_BUS_UNSPECIFIED |
> > (EFI_OEM_SPECIFIC | 0x00000000)) = 0x02008000<BR>
> >
> > --
> > 2.23.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-12 7:54 [PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/ShadowMicrocodePei: Add PCD for shadowing all microcode Aaron Li
2020-09-23 6:24 ` Ni, Ray
2020-09-24 1:37 ` Aaron Li [this message]
2020-09-24 8:56 ` Ni, Ray
2020-10-13 2:05 ` Siyuan, Fu
2020-10-13 2:46 ` Ni, Ray
2020-10-15 1:35 ` Aaron Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB3623AFDFD368B8DD04FB876E97390@BYAPR11MB3623.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox