public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Shenglei" <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Desimone, Nathaniel L" <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Kubacki, Michael A" <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>,
	"Chiu, Chasel" <chasel.chiu@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Add return value when OutTable is NULL
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:48:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C0706E73DB8C124D9B9C38AA364E5D5E0562D064@SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02A34F284D1DA44BB705E61F7180EF0AAEED9252@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Nathaniel,

Thanks for your comments and below is my response.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Desimone, Nathaniel L
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 3:25 AM
> To: Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Chiu, Chasel
> <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Add return
> value when OutTable is NULL
> 
> Hi Shenglei,
> 
> I don't see how this patch is at all related to the previous version of this patch.

What is different from the previous version is that this patch update the copyright year and the "if...else" coding style.

> Also, you are introducing yet another new bug with this patch. Moreover,
> this bug is unrelated to the previous bug.
> 
> Please take a look at the function TestPointGetAcpi(). With your change
> added, this function is now broken since Table is a stack variable and it is not
> being initialized to zero. This function assumes that
> DumpAcpiXsdt()/DumpAcpiRsdt() will do the initialization to zero on it's
> behalf, you have broken this assumption with your change.

I have taken a look at the function TestPointGetAcpi(). The variable Table is first initialized to NULL by
DumpAcpiXsdt()/DumpAcpiRsdt(). The reference code is "*OutTable = NULL"(line 667). And it will be assigned
a value next. The reference code is "*OutTable = Table"(line 689).

And with my changes, the stack variable Table(equivalent  to *OutTable in DumpAcpiXsdt/ DumpAcpiRsdt) can still be
initialized to NULL or assigned a value. What I did is intended to check the address of "Table",
since there is no point to perform operations to "Table" if its address is NULL.

Thanks,
Shenglei

> 
> Both this patch and the previous patch have been made carelessly and I am
> not impressed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nate
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2019 6:09 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Chiu, Chasel
> <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Add return value
> when OutTable is NULL
> 
> Currently there is no check for the parameter OutTable.
> So add the logic that return value EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when the
> OutTable is NULL.
> 
> Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
> Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:Update the copyright and the if...else statement coding style.
> 
>  .../Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheckAcpi.c           | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git
> a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheck
> Acpi.c
> b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheck
> Acpi.c
> index 263781a2..83736bf3 100644
> ---
> a/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCheck
> Acpi.c
> +++
> b/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Test/Library/TestPointCheckLib/DxeCh
> +++ eckAcpi.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  /** @file
> 
> -Copyright (c) 2017, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> +Copyright (c) 2017 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
>  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> 
>  **/
> @@ -610,6 +610,8 @@ DumpAcpiRsdt (
> 
>    if (OutTable != NULL) {
>      *OutTable = NULL;
> +  } else{
> +    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>    }
> 
>    ReturnStatus = EFI_SUCCESS;
> @@ -663,6 +665,8 @@ DumpAcpiXsdt (
> 
>    if (OutTable != NULL) {
>      *OutTable = NULL;
> +  } else{
> +    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>    }
> 
>    ReturnStatus = EFI_SUCCESS;
> --
> 2.18.0.windows.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-17  2:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-16  1:08 [PATCH v2] MinPlatformPkg/TestPointCheckLib: Add return value when OutTable is NULL Zhang, Shenglei
2019-09-16  2:17 ` Chiu, Chasel
2019-09-16 19:25 ` Nate DeSimone
2019-09-17  2:48   ` Zhang, Shenglei [this message]
2019-09-17 21:46     ` Nate DeSimone
2019-09-19  4:25 ` [edk2-devel] " Kubacki, Michael A

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C0706E73DB8C124D9B9C38AA364E5D5E0562D064@SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox