From: "Zhang, Shenglei" <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
"Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe: Fix the index of array TargetUrlp[]
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:02:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C0706E73DB8C124D9B9C38AA364E5D5E056404B2@SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb3e6246-2451-e43f-5b0d-56d66e6d0072@redhat.com>
Hi Philippe,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [mailto:philmd@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 5:35 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>;
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe: Fix the index of
> array TargetUrlp[]
>
> Hi Zhang,
>
> On 10/14/19 5:14 AM, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
> > After the expression,
> > 'CopyMem (&ConfigNvData->TargetUrl, Field->Str, Field->Len);',
> > the '\0' should be set to TargetUrl[Field->Len] rather than
> > TargetUrl[Field->Len + 1].
>
> ^ This is one change, ...
>
> > Besides the boundary check should be more strict.
> > Field->Len should range from 0-254 rather than 0-255.
>
> ^ ... and here we have another change.
>
> Can you split this in 2 patches?
I think these two changes should be included in one patch.
They are both about the variable ' Field->Len '. If one change pushed and the other one unchanged,
The logic is then wrong.
>
> > Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2: Add missing ')' which causes build failure.
> >
> > NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp.c | 7 ++++---
> > NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp6.c | 7 ++++---
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp.c
> b/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp.c
> > index d8c9fff6c65d..eac5b39991b7 100644
> > --- a/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp.c
> > +++ b/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp.c
> > @@ -122,11 +122,12 @@ IScsiDhcpExtractRootPath (
> > //
> > if ((!NET_IS_DIGIT (*(Field->Str))) && (*(Field->Str) != '[')) {
> > ConfigNvData->DnsMode = TRUE;
> > - if (Field->Len > sizeof (ConfigNvData->TargetUrl)) {
> > - return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> > + if (Field->Len >= sizeof (ConfigNvData->TargetUrl)) {
> > + Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> > + goto ON_EXIT;
>
> This is a change in the code flow. So now we free he allocated TmpStr.
> This is correct, but you did not commented that change in the
> description. So we currently have a memory leak. Please do not hide that
> kind of information in patches.
Yes the commit message should contain this change.
>
> > }
> > CopyMem (&ConfigNvData->TargetUrl, Field->Str, Field->Len);
> > - ConfigNvData->TargetUrl[Field->Len + 1] = '\0';
> > + ConfigNvData->TargetUrl[Field->Len] = '\0';
>
> And here we have 1 byte of memory info leak.
>
> Are you fixing a Security BZ?
No, I found this issue by my local tool. There is no BZ for this.
Thanks,
Shenglei
>
> > } else {
> > ConfigNvData->DnsMode = FALSE;
> > ZeroMem(ConfigNvData->TargetUrl, sizeof (ConfigNvData->TargetUrl));
> > diff --git a/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp6.c
> b/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp6.c
> > index 86a872adeccc..be66e6684a0e 100644
> > --- a/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp6.c
> > +++ b/NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiDhcp6.c
> > @@ -161,11 +161,12 @@ IScsiDhcp6ExtractRootPath (
> > // Server name is expressed as domain name, just save it.
> > //
> > if (ConfigNvData->DnsMode) {
> > - if (Field->Len > sizeof (ConfigNvData->TargetUrl)) {
> > - return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> > + if (Field->Len >= sizeof (ConfigNvData->TargetUrl)) {
> > + Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> > + goto ON_EXIT;
> > }
> > CopyMem (&ConfigNvData->TargetUrl, Field->Str, Field->Len);
> > - ConfigNvData->TargetUrl[Field->Len + 1] = '\0';
> > + ConfigNvData->TargetUrl[Field->Len] = '\0';
> > } else {
> > ZeroMem(&ConfigNvData->TargetUrl, sizeof (ConfigNvData-
> >TargetUrl));
> > Status = IScsiAsciiStrToIp (Field->Str, IpMode, &Ip);
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 3:14 [PATCH v2] NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe: Fix the index of array TargetUrlp[] Zhang, Shenglei
2019-10-14 9:34 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-14 14:02 ` Zhang, Shenglei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C0706E73DB8C124D9B9C38AA364E5D5E056404B2@SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox