From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35; helo=mail-io1-xd35.google.com; envelope-from=sajee.kk@gmail.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A2EB211B112A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:57:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id c2so10155234iom.12 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:57:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IW84P2CvLiebwyQNo5ZM0tAfyw1Ph0s3WZuYLVxHijk=; b=ZSBZS9sgczeu32EYLNhK3+8BK8d5hwwCnkYhN8uPHw91jqSkwuBI7PHKPYnRB8SSoK NU0zOg+S5jS9h1vXWN3i12gSCQTW5ZiFXvi7QBWdEysntAfaQ/qZPlQGrfcn+9sVHJnR 6hx3qNrHkm4LdrCN0mLFmfgsvomzrb/5FpMzzAfK/iYY6JRj2pdDnETRKL869kKvlSj/ 6XcBbTY5Q7qKfePqzynFv1t/YaKhYu2bIbU20wUPyXupb/M0n9gqvz4xlrjDK3JDQSMG 21HqdY6AGY/FdcAgMVsLuC8VKzQQmGPZh3RT+Tw7x1TlTsGPTollBQHv9+mR0AL55hk8 WVGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IW84P2CvLiebwyQNo5ZM0tAfyw1Ph0s3WZuYLVxHijk=; b=qxTO+f9OJmF1QaCQNuRJy2Xc2LYOINyblBPISseWY7X4+yhaeio7A2wzqP4Ybptlov tSG/Ms0PcFYmRyhQ45NHOixJOd34hmabZ79cRlqLJWq+BwABV/nw6K3EMPCkoCeK+bhz VH8pJj5p6iJHqxX3PVI5ZRrq9VCm8sWGtkFk8Y/l78c+QGFon7/6a+QnecWYOsAOIH8T WviyF2xzSlZ+PAU6I0fIqGPaYu4m5f0WLc22UMTYQsLaxnY7V1+FhIgKCrmuWgZti7X2 NZmGqWpaDFLXYT4g6gWJzoKhUELASPV9GDgBfTfyfwgWffCmS50eGgVMYnFqt6F9gLha dI0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZkdspBPKYgyFxqmSsKZc4UTCeY3wip2amdZvLk4qV1BaEUGT1z zQbUjiuuSXpkpY0OfDW834e2+WyTB+MmypJIp4o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7ekhncDfnwg60TTlvwBM2N6SjgoPJvg8ss1Yiv8VA48v/3jHPvoowCpaIT9Sk3bmOIQfx+uPgFWgs0TsgamvQ= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:bf41:: with SMTP id p62mr9926482iof.193.1548521873157; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:57:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Sajeesh Kk Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:27:41 +0530 Message-ID: To: Rafael Machado Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: BlockIo2 Protocol test tool X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:57:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Rafeal, I believe The UEFI Sct test suite cannot be used for performance testing. Are there any tools which can be used from UEFI shell to measure disk IO perfomance using BlockIO2 Protocol ? Please let me know. Thanks, Sajeesh. On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 9:39 PM Rafael Machado < rafaelrodrigues.machado@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sajeesh > > Probably you can use UEFI Sct for this test. > http://uefi.org/testtools > > Thanks and Regards > Rafael Machado > > Em s=C3=A1b, 26 de jan de 2019 00:24, Sajeesh Kk >> Hello all, >> >> I have a prototype BlockIO2 protocol implementation. Are there any >> independent tools available to test this out ?. Please let me know. >> >> Thanks, >> Sajeesh. >> _______________________________________________ >> edk2-devel mailing list >> edk2-devel@lists.01.org >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel >> >