Yes Chasel - please do so while merging, thanks! On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:58 AM Chiu, Chasel wrote: > > That’s good suggestion Pedro! > Ranbir, would you like me to modify your patch to "return 0" during > merging? > > Thanks, > Chasel > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Pedro > > Falcato > > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 5:29 AM > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rsingh@ventanamicro.com > > Cc: Chiu, Chasel ; Desimone, Nathaniel L > > ; Zeng, Star ; > Ranbir > > Singh > > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] > IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: > > Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:16 PM Ranbir Singh > > wrote: > > > > > > FspData->PerfIdx is getting increased for every call unconditionally > > > in the function SetFspMeasurePoint and hence memory access can happen > > > for out of bound FspData->PerfData[] array entries also. > > > > > > Example - > > > FspData->PerfData is an array of 32 UINT64 entries. Assume a call > > > is made to SetFspMeasurePoint function when the FspData->PerfIdx > > > last value is 31. It gets incremented to 32 at line 400. > > > Any subsequent call to SetFspMeasurePoint functions leads to > > > FspData->PerfData[32] getting accessed which is out of the PerfData > > > array as well as the FSP_GLOBAL_DATA structure boundary. > > > > > > Hence keep array access and index increment inside if block only and > > > return invalid performance timestamp when PerfIdx is invalid. > > > > > > Cc: Chasel Chiu > > > Cc: Nate DeSimone > > > Cc: Star Zeng > > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200 > > > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh > > > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh > > > --- > > > IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c | 6 ++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c > > > b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c > > > index a22b0e7825ad..cda2a7b2478e 100644 > > > --- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c > > > +++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c > > > @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ GetFspSiliconInitUpdDataPointer ( > > > > > > @param[in] Id Measurement point ID. > > > > > > - @return performance timestamp. > > > + @return performance timestamp if current PerfIdx is valid, > > > + else return 0 as invalid performance timestamp > > > **/ > > > UINT64 > > > EFIAPI > > > @@ -395,9 +396,10 @@ SetFspMeasurePoint ( > > > if (FspData->PerfIdx < sizeof (FspData->PerfData) / sizeof (FspData- > > >PerfData[0])) { > > > FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx] = AsmReadTsc > (); > > > ((UINT8 *)(&FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]))[7] = Id; > > > + return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++]; > > > } > > > > > > - return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++]; > > > + return (UINT64)0x0000000000000000; > > > > return 0; > > > > Works just as well. You also don't need a cast. > > > > https://godbolt.org/z/e5vvGcWWo > > > > -- > > Pedro > > > > > > > > > >